Argumentazioaren teoriaren historia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published
06/12/2024
Pello Huizi
Abstract
The aim of this work is to present the main theories on argumentation developed through history, or rather some of them. We will start from ancient Greece, taking into account the sophists and above all Aristotle. Then, we will go to ancient Rome, to show the basics of the works of Cicero and Quintilian and also the Rhetorica ad Herennium, due to an anonymous author. We will offer the next section to the long declining of argumentation theory. After that, we will make reference to the renaissance of the studies on argumentation leaded by Stephen Toulmin eta Chaïm Perelman, in 1958. And, in the last section, following the pioneer work of those authors, we will analyse some of the relevant contributions appeared in the last decades.
How to Cite
Huizi, P. (2024). Argumentazioaren teoriaren historia. Gogoa, 24. https://doi.org/10.1387/gogoa.26077
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
argumentation , sophists, rhetoric, Aristotle, Perelman, Toulmin, pragma-dialectics
References
Aintziart, Piarres. 1987. “Aristotele”. In P. Iztueta (zuz.), Filosofia. Hiztegia. Donostia: UZEI.
Anscombre, Jean Claude eta Oswald Ducrot. 1983. L’Argumentation dans la langue. Brusela: Mardaga.
Aristoteles. 1967. Topiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. [Jacques Brunschwigek argitaratu eta itzulia].
Aristoteles. 1991. On Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [George A. Kennedyk itzulia].
Aristoteles. 1994/1998. Rhetoric [W. Rhys Robertsek itzulia]. http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/Aristotle/Rhetoric/Rhetoric.html
Aristoteles. 2001. Retórica. Madril: Alianza. [Alberto Bernabéren itzulpena eta oharrak].
Barth, Else M. eta Erik C.W. Krabbe. 1982. From axiom to dialogue: a philosophical study of logics and argumentation. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Barthes, Roland. 1994. “L’ancienne rhétorique”. In R. Barthes, Oeuvres completes (vol. III). Paris: Seuil.
Breton, Philippe eta G. Gauthier. 2000. Histoire des théories de l’argumentation. Paris: La Découverte.
Cassin, Barbara. 1990. “Bonnes et mauvaises rhétoriques: de Platon à Perelman”. In M. Meyer eta A. Lempereur (arg.), Figures et conflits rhétoriques. Brusela: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Compagnon, Antoine. 1999. “La réhabilitation de la rhétorique au xxe siècle”. In M. Fumaroli (zuz.), Histoire de la rhétorique dans l’Europe moderne (1450-1950). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Corbett, Edward P. J. 1986. “The changing strategies of argumentation from ancient to modern times”. In J. L. Golden eta J. J. Pilotta (arg.), Practical reasoning in human affairs: Studies in honor of Chaim Perelman. Dordrecht, Holanda: Reidel.
Danblon, Emmanuelle. 2003. “La rhétorique: art de la preuve ou art de la persuasion?” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2/2010.
Descartes, René. 1997. Metodoari buruzko diskurtsoa. Meditazio metafisikoak. Bilbo: Klasikoak.
Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Eemeren, Frans H. van eta R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eemeren, Frans H. van eta R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eemeren, Frans H. van eta R. Grootendorst. 1997. “Argumentation”. In T. A. van Dijk (arg.), Discourse as Structure and Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Eemeren, Frans H. van eta R. Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob grootendorst eta Tjark Kruiger. 1987. Handbook of Argumentation. A Critical Survey of Classical Background and Modern Studies. Dordrecht, Cinnaminson: Foris.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob grootendorst eta Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (arg.). 1996. Fundamentals of argumentation theory. A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fumaroli, Marc. 1999. “Préface”. In M. Fumaroli (zuz.), Histoire de la rhétorique dans l’Europe moderne (1450-1950). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Gauthier, Gilles. 2007. “Editorial Argumentation in the American Press. A Look at the New York Times and Washington Post”. http://www.com.ulaval.ca/personnel/professeurs/gilles_gauthier/Editorial_Argumentation.pdf
Golder, Caroline. 1996. Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Grize, Jean-Blaize. 1990. Logique et langage. Paris: Ophrys.
Halsall, Albert W. 1989. “La rhétorique en 1990”. Texte 8/9: v-xviii. http://www.texte.ca/intro8.pdf
Hamblin, CHarles l. 1970. Fallacies. Londres: Methuen.
Johnson, Ralph H. 2000. Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, N.J.: LEA.
Kennedy, George A. 1991. Aristotle: On rhetoric — A theory of civic discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koyré, Alexandre. 1962. Introduction à la lecture de Platon. Paris: Gallimard.
Margolin, Jean Claude. 1999. “L’apogée de la rhétorique humaniste”. In M. Fumaroli (zuz.), Histoire de la rhétorique dans l’Europe moderne (1450-1950). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Marrou, Henri Irénée. 1948. Histoire de l’éducation dans l’antiquité. Paris: Seuil.
Meyer, Michel. 1982. Logique, langage et argumentation. Paris : Hachette.
Perelman, Chaïm eta L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Brusela: Université de Bruxelles (gaztelaniaz: Tratado de la argumentación: La nueva retórica. Madrid: Gredos, 1989).
Perelman, Chaïm. 1984. “The New Rhetoric and the rhetoricians”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 188-196.
Plantin, Christian. 1990. Essais sur l’argumentation: introduction à l’étude linguistique de la parole argumentative. Paris: Kimé.
Plantin, Christian. 1996. L’argumentation. Paris: Seuil.
Plantin, Christian. 1998. “Les raisons des émotions”. In M. Bondi (arg.), Forms of argumentative discourse. Per un’analisi linguistica dell’argomentare. Bologne: CLUEB.
Reichelt, Stefan. 2008. The history of rhetoric and modern rhetorical analysis. Pro Scientia, Graz. http://www.proscientia.at/uploads/media/Stefan_Reichelt_-_The_History_of_Rhetoric_and_Modern_Rheto_.pdf
Spence, Gerry. 1995. How to Argue and Win Every Time, At Home, At work, In court, Everywhere, Everyday. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Walton, Douglas. 1992. The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvannia State University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations (PI). Oxford: Blackwell. [G.E.M. Anscombe eta R. Rheesek argitaratua, eta G.E.M. Anscombek itzulia].
Anscombre, Jean Claude eta Oswald Ducrot. 1983. L’Argumentation dans la langue. Brusela: Mardaga.
Aristoteles. 1967. Topiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. [Jacques Brunschwigek argitaratu eta itzulia].
Aristoteles. 1991. On Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [George A. Kennedyk itzulia].
Aristoteles. 1994/1998. Rhetoric [W. Rhys Robertsek itzulia]. http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/Aristotle/Rhetoric/Rhetoric.html
Aristoteles. 2001. Retórica. Madril: Alianza. [Alberto Bernabéren itzulpena eta oharrak].
Barth, Else M. eta Erik C.W. Krabbe. 1982. From axiom to dialogue: a philosophical study of logics and argumentation. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Barthes, Roland. 1994. “L’ancienne rhétorique”. In R. Barthes, Oeuvres completes (vol. III). Paris: Seuil.
Breton, Philippe eta G. Gauthier. 2000. Histoire des théories de l’argumentation. Paris: La Découverte.
Cassin, Barbara. 1990. “Bonnes et mauvaises rhétoriques: de Platon à Perelman”. In M. Meyer eta A. Lempereur (arg.), Figures et conflits rhétoriques. Brusela: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Compagnon, Antoine. 1999. “La réhabilitation de la rhétorique au xxe siècle”. In M. Fumaroli (zuz.), Histoire de la rhétorique dans l’Europe moderne (1450-1950). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Corbett, Edward P. J. 1986. “The changing strategies of argumentation from ancient to modern times”. In J. L. Golden eta J. J. Pilotta (arg.), Practical reasoning in human affairs: Studies in honor of Chaim Perelman. Dordrecht, Holanda: Reidel.
Danblon, Emmanuelle. 2003. “La rhétorique: art de la preuve ou art de la persuasion?” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2/2010.
Descartes, René. 1997. Metodoari buruzko diskurtsoa. Meditazio metafisikoak. Bilbo: Klasikoak.
Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Eemeren, Frans H. van eta R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eemeren, Frans H. van eta R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eemeren, Frans H. van eta R. Grootendorst. 1997. “Argumentation”. In T. A. van Dijk (arg.), Discourse as Structure and Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Eemeren, Frans H. van eta R. Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob grootendorst eta Tjark Kruiger. 1987. Handbook of Argumentation. A Critical Survey of Classical Background and Modern Studies. Dordrecht, Cinnaminson: Foris.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob grootendorst eta Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (arg.). 1996. Fundamentals of argumentation theory. A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fumaroli, Marc. 1999. “Préface”. In M. Fumaroli (zuz.), Histoire de la rhétorique dans l’Europe moderne (1450-1950). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Gauthier, Gilles. 2007. “Editorial Argumentation in the American Press. A Look at the New York Times and Washington Post”. http://www.com.ulaval.ca/personnel/professeurs/gilles_gauthier/Editorial_Argumentation.pdf
Golder, Caroline. 1996. Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Grize, Jean-Blaize. 1990. Logique et langage. Paris: Ophrys.
Halsall, Albert W. 1989. “La rhétorique en 1990”. Texte 8/9: v-xviii. http://www.texte.ca/intro8.pdf
Hamblin, CHarles l. 1970. Fallacies. Londres: Methuen.
Johnson, Ralph H. 2000. Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, N.J.: LEA.
Kennedy, George A. 1991. Aristotle: On rhetoric — A theory of civic discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koyré, Alexandre. 1962. Introduction à la lecture de Platon. Paris: Gallimard.
Margolin, Jean Claude. 1999. “L’apogée de la rhétorique humaniste”. In M. Fumaroli (zuz.), Histoire de la rhétorique dans l’Europe moderne (1450-1950). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Marrou, Henri Irénée. 1948. Histoire de l’éducation dans l’antiquité. Paris: Seuil.
Meyer, Michel. 1982. Logique, langage et argumentation. Paris : Hachette.
Perelman, Chaïm eta L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Brusela: Université de Bruxelles (gaztelaniaz: Tratado de la argumentación: La nueva retórica. Madrid: Gredos, 1989).
Perelman, Chaïm. 1984. “The New Rhetoric and the rhetoricians”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 188-196.
Plantin, Christian. 1990. Essais sur l’argumentation: introduction à l’étude linguistique de la parole argumentative. Paris: Kimé.
Plantin, Christian. 1996. L’argumentation. Paris: Seuil.
Plantin, Christian. 1998. “Les raisons des émotions”. In M. Bondi (arg.), Forms of argumentative discourse. Per un’analisi linguistica dell’argomentare. Bologne: CLUEB.
Reichelt, Stefan. 2008. The history of rhetoric and modern rhetorical analysis. Pro Scientia, Graz. http://www.proscientia.at/uploads/media/Stefan_Reichelt_-_The_History_of_Rhetoric_and_Modern_Rheto_.pdf
Spence, Gerry. 1995. How to Argue and Win Every Time, At Home, At work, In court, Everywhere, Everyday. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Walton, Douglas. 1992. The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvannia State University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations (PI). Oxford: Blackwell. [G.E.M. Anscombe eta R. Rheesek argitaratua, eta G.E.M. Anscombek itzulia].
Section
Zabal-zehatz begiratuz