What's Wrong With Our Theories of Evidence?
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published
16-04-2014
Julian Reiss
Abstract
This paper reviews all major theories of evidence such as the Bayesian theory, hypothetico-deductivism, satisfaction theories, error-statistics, Achinstein's explanationist theory and Cartwright's argument theory. All these theories fail to take adequate account of the context in which a hypothesis is established and used. It is argued that the context of an inquiry determines important facts about what evidence is, and how much and what kind has to be collected to establish a hypothesis for a given purpose.
How to Cite
Reiss, J. (2014). What’s Wrong With Our Theories of Evidence?. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 29(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.10782
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Issue
Section
STATE OF THE ART
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.