What's Wrong With Our Theories of Evidence?

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 16, 2014
Julian Reiss

Abstract

This paper reviews all major theories of evidence such as the Bayesian theory, hypothetico-deductivism, satisfaction theories, error-statistics, Achinstein's explanationist theory and Cartwright's argument theory. All these theories fail to take adequate account of the context in which a hypothesis is established and used. It is argued that the context of an inquiry determines important facts about what evidence is, and how much and what kind has to be collected to establish a hypothesis for a given purpose.

How to Cite

Reiss, J. (2014). What’s Wrong With Our Theories of Evidence?. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 29(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.10782
Abstract 1689 | PDF Downloads 1090

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
STATE OF THE ART