Inconsistency as a Touchstone for Coherence Measures

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 17, 2015
Mark Siebel Michael Schippers

Abstract

The debate on probabilistic measures of coherence has focused on evaluating sets of consistent propositions. In this paper we draw attention to the largely neglected question of whether such measures concur with intuitions on test cases involving inconsistent propositions and whether they satisfy general adequacy constraints on coherence and inconsistency. While it turns out that, for the vast majority of measures in their original shape, this question must be answered in the negative, we show that it is possible to adapt many of them in order to improve their performance.

How to Cite

Siebel, M., & Schippers, M. (2015). Inconsistency as a Touchstone for Coherence Measures. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 30(1), 11–41. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.12485
Abstract 855 | PDF Downloads 461

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

coherence, inconsistency, confirmation, probabilistic measures, Bayesian epistemology

Section
MONOGRAPHIC SECTION