According to Helen Longino, objectivity is necessarily social as it depends on critical interactions in community. Justin Biddle argues that Longino's account presupposes individuals that are completely open to any criticism; as such individuals are in principle able to criticise their beliefs on their own, Longino's account is not really social. In the first part of my paper I argue that even for completely open individuals, criticism for maintaining objectivity is only possible in community. In the second part I challenge Biddle's interpretation of Longino's conception of the individual. I conclude that Longino's account is necessarily social.
How to Cite
Biddle, Collins, criticism, epistemic subject, Kusch, Longino, objectivity, social epistemology, rule-following, tacit knowledge
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.