Consciousness and Theory of Mind: a Common Theory?

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 17-02-2016
Miguel Ángel Sebastián

Abstract

Many philosophers and scientists have argued that the difference between phenomenally conscious states and other kind of states lies in the implicit self-awareness that conscious states have. Higher-Order Representationalist (HOR) theories, attempt to explain such a self-awareness by means of a higher-order representation. Consciousness relies on our capacity to represent our own mental states, consciousness depends on our Theory of Mind. Such an ability can, at least conceptually, be decomposed into another two: mindreading and metacognition.

 

In this paper I will argue that consciousness cannot depend on mindreading. The tenability of HOR theories depends, therefore, on the relation between mindreading and metacognition. I analyze several views on such a relation and argue that none of them seem to be a plausible option for HOR theories.

How to Cite

Sebastián, M. Ángel. (2016). Consciousness and Theory of Mind: a Common Theory?. THEORIA, 31(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.14091
Abstract 705 | PDF Downloads 568

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Consciousness, Self-awareness, Higher-Order Theories, Theory of Mind, Mindreading, Metacognition.

Section
ARTICLES