Pluralistic Mechanism

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 14-06-2017
Abel Wajnerman Paz

Abstract

An argument recently proposed by Chirimuuta (2014) seems to motivate the rejection of the claims that every neurocognitive phenomenon can have a mechanistic explanation and that every neurocognitive explanation is mechanistic. In this paper, I focus on efficient coding models involving the so-called "canonical neural computations" and argue that although they imply some form of pluralism, they are compatible with two mechanistic generalizations: all neurocognitive explanations are (at least in part) mechanistic; and all neurocognitive phenomena that have an explanation have (at least) a purely mechanistic explanation. 

How to Cite

Wajnerman Paz, A. (2017). Pluralistic Mechanism. THEORIA, 32(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.16877
Abstract 426 | PDF Downloads 334

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

pluralism, mechanism, optimality, neural computation, neural coding

Section
ARTICLES