The Rationalist Reply to Fodor's Analyticity and Circularity Challenge

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 18-02-2013
Víctor M. Verdejo

Abstract

The Fodorian central objections to Inferential Role Semantics (IRS) can be taken to include an 'Analyticity Challenge' and a 'Circularity Challenge', which are ultimately challenges to IRS explanations of concept possession. In this paper I present inferential role theories, critically examine these challenges and point out two misunderstandings to which they are exposed. I then state in detail a rationalist version of IRS and argue that this version meets head on the Fodorian challenges. If sound, these considerations show that there is no problem of principle in the consideration of IRS as a good candidate for a theory of concepts.

How to Cite

M. Verdejo, V. (2013). The Rationalist Reply to Fodor’s Analyticity and Circularity Challenge. THEORIA, 28(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.1881
Abstract 726 | PDF Downloads 355

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Analyticity, Theoretical Circularity, Rationalist IRS, Complete Frege Test

Section
ARTICLES