Jan Swammerdam and the limits of preformationism

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 05-12-2019
Miguel Escribano Cabeza

Abstract

This paper takes an organicist perspective of Jan Swammerdam's conception of metamorphis which allows us to identify a continuity betweem W. Harvey's epigenetism and G.W. Leibniz' preformationism – two historically opposed perspectives. In line with this reading, I provide a critical assessment of the different preformationist interpretations of Swammerdam. The thesis that I defend in this paper is that the idea of preformation does not imply so much a theory about the origin of the embryo but a model of ontogenetic development that cannot be catalogued as mechanistic or as vitalist.

How to Cite

Escribano Cabeza, M. (2019). Jan Swammerdam and the limits of preformationism. THEORIA, 34(3), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.20336
Abstract 274 | PDF (Español) Downloads 200 XML (Español) Downloads 242

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Jan Swammerdam, metamorphosis, preformationism, epigenesis, organicism, William Harvey, G.W. Leibniz

Section
ARTICLES