Scientific innovation: A conceptual explication and a dilemma

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 05-12-2019
Thomas Sturm

Abstract

I offer an analysis of the concept of scientific innovation. When research is innovated, highly noveland usefulelements of investigation begin to spread through a scientific community, resulting from a process which is neither due to blind chance nor to necessity, but to a minimal use of rationality. This, however, leads to tension between two claims: (1) scientific innovation can be explained rationally; (2) no existing account of rationality explains scientific innovation. There are good reasons to maintain (1) and (2), but it is difficult for both claims to be accepted simultaneously by a rational subject.In particular, I argue that neither standard nor bounded theories of rationality can deliver a satisfactory explanation of scientific innovations.

How to Cite

Sturm, T. (2019). Scientific innovation: A conceptual explication and a dilemma. THEORIA, 34(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.20652
Abstract 290 | PDF Downloads 256 XML Downloads 84

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Scientific innovation, rationality, heuristics, models of scientific change, science policy

Section
MONOGRAPHIC SECTION