Natural kinds: a new synthesis

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 16, 2020
Anouk Barberousse Françoise Longy Francesca Merlin
Stéphanie Ruphy

Abstract

What is a natural kind? This old yet lasting philosophical question has recently received new competing answers (e.g., Chakravartty, 2007; Magnus, 2014; Khalidi, 2013; Slater, 2015; Ereshefsky & Reydon, 2015). We show that the main ingredients of an encompassing and coherent account of natural kinds are actually on the table, but in need of the right articulation. It is by adopting a non-reductionist, naturalistic and non-conceptualist approach that, in this paper, we elaborate a new synthesis of all these ingredients. Our resulting proposition is a multiple-compartment theory of natural kinds that defines them in purely ontological terms, clearly distinguishes and relates ontological and epistemological issues - more precisely, two grains of ontological descriptions and two grains of explanatory success of natural kinds -, and which sheds light on why natural kinds play an epistemic role both within science and in everyday life.

How to Cite

Barberousse, A., Longy, F., Merlin, F., & Ruphy, S. (2020). Natural kinds: a new synthesis. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 35(3), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.21066
Abstract 399 | PDF Downloads 183 XML Downloads 61

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Natural Kind, HPC, Essentialism

Section
ARTICLES