Every view is a view from somewhere: Pragmatist laws and possibility

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 22-09-2023
H. K. Andersen

Abstract

Humean accounts of laws are often contrasted with governing accounts, and recent developments have added pragmatic versions of Humeanism. This paper offers Mitchell’s pragmatist, perspectival account of laws as a third option. The differences between these accounts come down to the role of modality. Mitchell’s bottom-up account allows for subtle gradations of modal content to be conveyed by laws. The perspectival character of laws is not an accident or something to be eventually eliminated – it is part of how this modal content is conveyed. I conclude with a discussion of the metaphysical commitments in Humeanism as requiring a perspectiveless view of the manifold from outside, and how Mitchell’s situated account is better able to account for the substantive notion of possibility involved in scientific laws.

How to Cite

Andersen, H. K. (2023). Every view is a view from somewhere: Pragmatist laws and possibility. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 38(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.24471
Abstract 110 | PDF Downloads 536 XML Downloads 140

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

pragmatism, Humeanism, laws, perspectivism, modality

Section
THE LULLIUS LECTURES