The Logical Dimension of Argumentation and Its Semantic Appraisal in Bermejo-Luque's Giving Reasons

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 01-09-2011
James B. Freeman

Abstract

We critically examine Bermejo-Luque's account of the logical dimension of argumentation and its logical or semantic evaluation. Our considerations concern her views on inference claims, validity, logical normativity, warrants, necessity, warrants and the justification of inferences, ontological versus epistemic modal qualifiers, ontological versus epistemic probability, and ontological versus conditional probability.

How to Cite

Freeman, J. B. (2011). The Logical Dimension of Argumentation and Its Semantic Appraisal in Bermejo-Luque’s Giving Reasons . THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 26(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.2946
Abstract 208 | PDF Downloads 222

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

logical dimension of argumentation, logical/semantic evaluation of argumentation, modal qualifiers, necessity, probability, Toulmin, validity, warrants

Section
FORUM