The Logical Dimension of Argumentation and Its Semantic Appraisal in Bermejo-Luque's Giving Reasons

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published 01-09-2011
DOI https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.2946
James B. Freeman

Abstract

We critically examine Bermejo-Luque's account of the logical dimension of argumentation and its logical or semantic evaluation. Our considerations concern her views on inference claims, validity, logical normativity, warrants, necessity, warrants and the justification of inferences, ontological versus epistemic modal qualifiers, ontological versus epistemic probability, and ontological versus conditional probability.

How to Cite

Freeman, J. B. (2011). The Logical Dimension of Argumentation and Its Semantic Appraisal in Bermejo-Luque’s Giving Reasons . THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 26(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.2946
Abstract 248 | PDF Downloads 263

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

logical dimension of argumentation, logical/semantic evaluation of argumentation, modal qualifiers, necessity, probability, Toulmin, validity, warrants

Issue
Vol. 26 No. 3 (2011): On L. Bermejo-Luque, Giving Reasons
Section
FORUM

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.