Steiner versus Wittgenstein: Remarks on Differing Views of Mathematical Truth

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 06-09-2005
Charles SAYWARD

Abstract

Mark Steiner criticizes some remarks Wittgenstein makes about Gödel. Steiner takes Wittgenstein to be disputing a mathematical result. The paper argues that Wittgenstein does no such thing. The contrast between the realist and the demonstrativist concerning mathematical truth is examined. Wittgenstein is held to side with neither camp. Rather, his point is that a realist argument is inconclusive.

How to Cite

SAYWARD, C. (2005). Steiner versus Wittgenstein: Remarks on Differing Views of Mathematical Truth. THEORIA, 20(3), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.567
Abstract 974 | PDF Downloads 597

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Mark Steiner, Gödel, Wittgenstein, Juliet Floyd, realism, mathematical truth, provability

Section
ARTICLES