Argumentos a fortiori

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published 10-01-2014
DOI https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.6275
Hubert Marraud
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Abstract

I offer an account of a fortiori arguments in the context of a Toulmin-style theory of argumentation schemes. A fortiori arguments contain a comparison of the strength of two or more arguments involving scalar inferences. We can distinguish two kinds of a fortiori arguments depending on whether those scalar inferences connect the premises and the conclusion or the backing and the warrant of the arguments. The first pattern has been studied by rhetoricians and the second pattern by legal argumentation theorists.

How to Cite

Marraud, H. (2014). Argumentos a fortiori. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 29(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.6275
Abstract 1133 | PDF Downloads 1856

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

a fortiori, analogy, argumentation scheme, backing, topos, warrant

Issue
Vol. 29 No. 1 (2014): Explanation, Causality, and Unification
Section
ARTICLES

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.