Fictional Reports A Study on the Semantics of Fictional Names

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published 16-06-2010
DOI https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.634
Fiora Salis

Abstract

Against standard descriptivist and referentialist semantics for fictional reports, I will defend a view according to which fictional names do not refer yet they can be distinguished from one another by virtue of their different name-using practices. The logical structures of sentences containing fictional names inherit these distinctions. Different interpretations follow.

How to Cite

Salis, F. (2010). Fictional Reports A Study on the Semantics of Fictional Names. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 25(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.634
Abstract 617 | PDF Downloads 442

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

fictional reports, fictional names, sententialism, interpreted logical forms, gappy propositions, name using practices

Issue
Vol. 25 No. 2 (2010): XIIth Taller d'Investigació en Filosofia
Section
MONOGRAPHIC SECTION

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.