Determinism and the Method of Difference

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 19-05-2011
Urs Hofmann Michael Baumgartner

Abstract

The first part of this paper reveals a conflict between the core principles of deterministic causation and the standard method of difference, which is widely seen (and used) as a correct method of causally analyzing deterministic structures. We show that applying the method of difference to deterministic structures can give rise to causal inferences that contradict the principles of deterministic causation. The second part then locates the source of this conflict in an inference rule implemented in the method of difference according to which factors that can make a difference to investigated effects relative to one particular test setup are to be identified as causes, provided the causal background of the corresponding setup is homogeneous. The paper ends by modifying the method of difference in a way that renders it compatible with the principles of deterministic causation.

How to Cite

Hofmann, U., & Baumgartner, M. (2011). Determinism and the Method of Difference. THEORIA, 26(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.988
Abstract 701 | PDF Downloads 236

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

causal reasoning, method of difference, interventionism, determinism

Section
ARTICLES