Recanati: context and contents of utterance

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 10/28/2011
Kepa Korta

Abstract

In Literal Meaning, François Recanati argues for contextualism on utterance meaning and content, against literalism, indexicalism and syncretic views. A widely held assumption among participants in the debate is the thesis I call 'monopropositionalism,' that is, the view that the utterance of a non-ambiguous sentence is associated with one and only one proposition (implicatures apart). The only position apparently incompatible with monopropositionalism seems to be the syncretic view, a view that Recanati rejects. However, he doesn't embrace monopropositionalism, as it is clear in his later book, Perspectival Thought.

How to Cite

Korta, K. (2011). Recanati: context and contents of utterance. Gogoa, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1387/gogoa.3506
Abstract 118 | PDF (Euskara) Downloads 66

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Ohar kritikoak