El objetivo de una sociedad inclusiva: bases para una propuesta alternativa
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The discourse of the unviable nature of the welfare state is argued as an inevitable consequence of economic logic, but in reality it involves changing the margins of tolerance adopted by society when faced with exclusion or, put another way, abandoning the hitherto accepted concept of an inclusive society. The crisis of an inclusive society is not the result of the failure of certain social policies. When the capacity for inclusion "fails", it is the model itself that is failing. This is what, in the current circumstances, makes it obligatory to think again about what is to be included or excluded. The demand for what should be goals of inclusion forms a central plank of the social and economic model and is the best reflection of its view of justice. This paper discusses three reflections. The first of these concerns the need to be familiar with the current features of trends in inequality, which represent the underlying factor weakening inclusiveness. The second takes up the current debate on the concept of welfare and its implications for greater demands for fairness. The third outlines the frame of reference of alternative thought, especially regarding human development, as theoretical categories allowing demands for inclusion to be reframed.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors who publish in the journal "Lan Harremanak" do so in agreement with the following terms:
1. Authors retain the copyright of their papers. while ceding to the journal "Lan Harremanak" the right to the first publication of their article.
2. The publisher UPV/EHU Press is a joint copyright holder, in order to protect the legitimate use of the published paper and compliance with CC terms.
3. Published papers are subject to a Creative Commons CC-BY license (unless stated otherwise) which permits third parties to share the paper, on the condition that the author and source are specified when material is reproduced.
4. Authors can enter into other non-exclusive license agreements regarding the published version of their work (e.g. depositing it in an institutional repository or re-publishing it as a monographic volume), providing the author and source are given appropriate credit.
5. Dissemination of submitted articles via Internet is both allowed and recommended (e.g. in institutional repositories and/or on the researcher's web page), both before and during the process of submission, since this can lead to interesting dialogues and also increase citations to the eventual publication.