Published Feb 26, 2020
Stephen J. Schmidt
Parfit's Repugnant Conclusion argues, against intuition, that for any world A, another world Z with higher population and minimal well-being is better. That intuition is incorrect because the argument has not considered resources that support well-being. Z must have many more resources supporting well-being than A does. Z is repugnant because it spreads those resources among too many people; another world with Z's resources and fewer people, if available, would be far superior. But Z is still better than A; it is worth accepting its very large population to get the resources needed to support their well-being.
How to Cite
Schmidt, S. J. (2020). Resources and the acceptability of the Repugnant Conclusion. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 35(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.20121
Repugnant Conclusion, resources, feasibility, population ethics
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.