Wright’s path analysis: Causal inference in the early twentieth century
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published
21-02-2024
Zili Dong
Abstract
Despite being a milestone in the history of statistical causal inference, Sewall Wright’s 1918 invention of path analysis did not receive much immediate attention from the statistical and scientific community. Through a careful historical analysis, this paper reveals some previously overlooked philosophical issues concerning the history of causal inference. Placing the invention of path analysis in a broader historical and intellectual context, I portray the scientific community’s initial lack of interest in the method as a natural consequence of relevant scientific and philosophical conditions. In addition to Karl Pearson’s positivist refutation of causation, I contend that the acceptance of path analysis faced several other challenges, including the introduction of a new formalism, conceptual barriers to causal inference, and the lack of model-based statistical thinking. The presence of these challenges shows that the delayed progress in causal inference in the early twentieth century was inevitable.
How to Cite
Dong, Z. (2024). Wright’s path analysis: Causal inference in the early twentieth century. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 39(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.24823
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
Causal inference, Path analysis, Sewall Wright, Karl Pearson, history of statistics
Issue
Section
ARTICLES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License.