Semantic Epistemology: Response to Machery

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Michael Devitt

Abstract

Machery argues: (1) that "philosophers' intuitions about reference are not more reliable than lay people's —if anything, they are probably worse"; (2) that "intuitions about the reference of proper names and uses of proper names provide equally good evidence for theories of reference". (1) lacks theoretical and empirical support. (2) cannot be right because usage provides the evidence that intuitions are reliable.

How to Cite

Devitt, M. (2012). Semantic Epistemology: Response to Machery. THEORIA, 27(2), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.6225
Abstract 559 | PDF Downloads 299

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

methodology, theory of reference, experiments, linguistic intuitions, linguistic usage, corpus, elicited production, Expertise Defense, bias

Section
ARTICLES