Pribatutasuna testuinguru-integritate gisa eta honen aplikazioa sare sozialetan
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Argitaratua
09-12-2015
Amaya Noain Sánchez
Laburpena
Lan honen helburua 1997.urtean Helen Nissenbaum-ek hedatutako testuinguru-integritatearen teoria marko teoriko gisa aurkeztea da, zaingo publikoko eremutan informazio pribatua babesteko. Nissenbaum-ek informazio-aroko pribatutasunaren babesa testuinguru bakoitzak eskatzen dituen informazio arauen mantentzearekin lotzen ditu, sare sozialen erabiltzaileen datu pribatuen babesa lortzeko abiapuntu alternatibo bat emanez.
Nola aipatu
Noain Sánchez, A. (2015). Pribatutasuna testuinguru-integritate gisa eta honen aplikazioa sare sozialetan. Zer - Komunikazio Ikasketen Aldizkaria, 20(39). https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.15531
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
ALLEN, Anita L. (1988). Uneasy access: privacy for women in a free society. New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield.
BARNES, Susan B. (2006). A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. En: First Monday, vol. 11, nº 9. [http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394/1312] (29 de mayo de 2013)
BÉJAR, Helena (1988). El ámbito íntimo: privacidad, individualismo y modernidad. Madrid: Alianza.
BOYD, Danah (2006). Friends, friendsters and myspace top 8: writing community into being on social networks sites. En: First Monday, vol. 1, nº 12. [http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html]. (29 de mayo de 2013)
BOYD, Danah y HARGITTAI, Eszter (2010). Facebook privacy settings: who cares? En: First Monday, vol. 15, nº 8, [http: //firstmonday.org/article/view/3086/2589] (10 de junio de 2013)
CURRY, Michael.R. (2002). Discursive displacement and the seminal ambiguity of space and place. En: LIEVROUW, Leah A y LIVINGSTONE, Sonia (eds.) The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICT. London: Sage Publications, pp. 502-517.
FRIED, Charles (1968). Privacy. En: The Yale Journal, vol. 77, pp. 475-493.
GARCÍA JIMÉNEZ, Leonarda (2008). Las ciencias de comunicación a la luz de las nuevas tecnologías: retos para una disciplina en la incertidumbre. En: Global Media Journal México, vol. 5, nº 10, pp.103-118.
GERETY, Tom (1977). Redefining privacy. En: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 12, nº 2, pp. 233-296.
GIOVANNI, Tabreez y PASHLEY, Harriet (2005). Students awareness of the privacy implications when using Facebook. En: Privacy poster fair at the school of Library and Information Science [ http: //lorrie.cranor.org/courses/fa05/tubzhlp.pdf] (20 de junio de 2013)
GROSS, Ralph y ACQUISITI, Alessandro (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. En: Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society'05. Nueva York: ACM Press, pp. 71-80.
HULL, Gordon; LIPFORD, Heather Richter y LLATULIPE, Celine (2010). Contextual gaps: privacy issues on Facebook. En: Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 13, nº 4, pp. 289-302.
LAMPE, Cliff; ELLISON, Nicole B. y STEINFIELD, Charles (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. En: CSCW'08. San Diego: ACM Press, pp. 721-730.
MILL, John Stuart (1976). On liberty. Londres: J.M. Dent & Sons. 1º Edición, 1859.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (2011). A contextual approach to privacy on line. En: Daedalus, vol. 140, nº 4, pp. 32-48.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (2010). Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. En: Washington Law Review, vol. 79, nº 1, pp. 101-139.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (1998). Protecting privacy in an Information Age: The problem of privacy in public. En: Law and Philosophy, vol. 17, nº 5-6, pp. 559-596.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (1997). Toward an approach to privacy in public: the challenges of information technology. En: Ethics and behaviour, vol.7, nº3, pp.207-219.
PARENT, William (1983). Privacy morality and the law. En: Philosophy & Public Affairs , vol. 12, nº 4, pp. 269-288.
PROSSER, Walter L. (1960). Privacy. En: California Law Review, vol. 48, pp. 383-423.
RACHELS, James (1975). Why privacy is important. En: Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 4, nº 4, pp. 323-333.
SCHOEMAN, Ferdinand (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SENNET, Richard (1977). The fall of public man. Nueva York: Knopf.
SLOBOGIN, Christopher (2002). Public privacy: camera surveillance of public places and the right to anonymity. En: Mississippi Law Journal, nº 72, pp. 213-299.
THOMPSON, John B. (1998). Los media y la modernidad: una teoría de los medios de comunicación. Barcelona: Paidós.
TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de (1981). De la démocratie en Amérique. París: Garnier Flammarion.
VAN DEN HOVEN, Jeroen (2001). Privacy and the varieties of informational wrongdoing. En: Readings in Cyber Ethics, pp. 430-435.
WACKS, Raymond (1989). Personal information: Privacy and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.
WARREN, Samuel y BRANDEIS, Louis (1890). The right to privacy. En: Harvard Law Review, vol. 4, nº 5, pp. 193-220. Traducción a cargo de PENDÁS, Benigno y BASELGA, Pilar (1995) El derecho a la intimidad. Madrid: Civitas.
ZIMMER, Michael (2007). Privacy and surveillance in Web 2.0: A study in contextual integrity and the emergence of Netaveillance. En: Society for Social studies of Science. [http://www.academia.edu/3943172/Privacy_and_Surveillance_in_Web_2.0_A_study_in_Contextual_Integrity_and_the_Emergence_of_Netaveillance] (19 de abril de 2013)
ZIMMER, Michael (2008). Privacy on planet Google: using the theory of contextual integrity to clarify the privacy threats of Google's quest for the perfect search engine. En: Journal of Business & Technology, vol. 3, pp.109-132.
ZIMMER, Michael (2005). Surveillance, privacy and the ethics of vehicle safety communication technologies. En: Ethics and Information Technology, vol.7, nº4, p. 201-221.
BARNES, Susan B. (2006). A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. En: First Monday, vol. 11, nº 9. [http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394/1312] (29 de mayo de 2013)
BÉJAR, Helena (1988). El ámbito íntimo: privacidad, individualismo y modernidad. Madrid: Alianza.
BOYD, Danah (2006). Friends, friendsters and myspace top 8: writing community into being on social networks sites. En: First Monday, vol. 1, nº 12. [http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html]. (29 de mayo de 2013)
BOYD, Danah y HARGITTAI, Eszter (2010). Facebook privacy settings: who cares? En: First Monday, vol. 15, nº 8, [http: //firstmonday.org/article/view/3086/2589] (10 de junio de 2013)
CURRY, Michael.R. (2002). Discursive displacement and the seminal ambiguity of space and place. En: LIEVROUW, Leah A y LIVINGSTONE, Sonia (eds.) The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICT. London: Sage Publications, pp. 502-517.
FRIED, Charles (1968). Privacy. En: The Yale Journal, vol. 77, pp. 475-493.
GARCÍA JIMÉNEZ, Leonarda (2008). Las ciencias de comunicación a la luz de las nuevas tecnologías: retos para una disciplina en la incertidumbre. En: Global Media Journal México, vol. 5, nº 10, pp.103-118.
GERETY, Tom (1977). Redefining privacy. En: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 12, nº 2, pp. 233-296.
GIOVANNI, Tabreez y PASHLEY, Harriet (2005). Students awareness of the privacy implications when using Facebook. En: Privacy poster fair at the school of Library and Information Science [ http: //lorrie.cranor.org/courses/fa05/tubzhlp.pdf] (20 de junio de 2013)
GROSS, Ralph y ACQUISITI, Alessandro (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. En: Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society'05. Nueva York: ACM Press, pp. 71-80.
HULL, Gordon; LIPFORD, Heather Richter y LLATULIPE, Celine (2010). Contextual gaps: privacy issues on Facebook. En: Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 13, nº 4, pp. 289-302.
LAMPE, Cliff; ELLISON, Nicole B. y STEINFIELD, Charles (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. En: CSCW'08. San Diego: ACM Press, pp. 721-730.
MILL, John Stuart (1976). On liberty. Londres: J.M. Dent & Sons. 1º Edición, 1859.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (2011). A contextual approach to privacy on line. En: Daedalus, vol. 140, nº 4, pp. 32-48.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (2010). Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. En: Washington Law Review, vol. 79, nº 1, pp. 101-139.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (1998). Protecting privacy in an Information Age: The problem of privacy in public. En: Law and Philosophy, vol. 17, nº 5-6, pp. 559-596.
NISSENBAUM, Helen (1997). Toward an approach to privacy in public: the challenges of information technology. En: Ethics and behaviour, vol.7, nº3, pp.207-219.
PARENT, William (1983). Privacy morality and the law. En: Philosophy & Public Affairs , vol. 12, nº 4, pp. 269-288.
PROSSER, Walter L. (1960). Privacy. En: California Law Review, vol. 48, pp. 383-423.
RACHELS, James (1975). Why privacy is important. En: Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 4, nº 4, pp. 323-333.
SCHOEMAN, Ferdinand (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SENNET, Richard (1977). The fall of public man. Nueva York: Knopf.
SLOBOGIN, Christopher (2002). Public privacy: camera surveillance of public places and the right to anonymity. En: Mississippi Law Journal, nº 72, pp. 213-299.
THOMPSON, John B. (1998). Los media y la modernidad: una teoría de los medios de comunicación. Barcelona: Paidós.
TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de (1981). De la démocratie en Amérique. París: Garnier Flammarion.
VAN DEN HOVEN, Jeroen (2001). Privacy and the varieties of informational wrongdoing. En: Readings in Cyber Ethics, pp. 430-435.
WACKS, Raymond (1989). Personal information: Privacy and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.
WARREN, Samuel y BRANDEIS, Louis (1890). The right to privacy. En: Harvard Law Review, vol. 4, nº 5, pp. 193-220. Traducción a cargo de PENDÁS, Benigno y BASELGA, Pilar (1995) El derecho a la intimidad. Madrid: Civitas.
ZIMMER, Michael (2007). Privacy and surveillance in Web 2.0: A study in contextual integrity and the emergence of Netaveillance. En: Society for Social studies of Science. [http://www.academia.edu/3943172/Privacy_and_Surveillance_in_Web_2.0_A_study_in_Contextual_Integrity_and_the_Emergence_of_Netaveillance] (19 de abril de 2013)
ZIMMER, Michael (2008). Privacy on planet Google: using the theory of contextual integrity to clarify the privacy threats of Google's quest for the perfect search engine. En: Journal of Business & Technology, vol. 3, pp.109-132.
ZIMMER, Michael (2005). Surveillance, privacy and the ethics of vehicle safety communication technologies. En: Ethics and Information Technology, vol.7, nº4, p. 201-221.
Zenbakia
Atala
Artikuluak
(c) UPV/EHU Press