Sexuality and religion in the public sphere. Opinions of French students on mediatization of intimate sphere

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Argitaratua 26-11-2020
Mihaela-Aleksandra Tudor Stefan Bratosin

Laburpena

This article explores the passive participation of French students within the construction of public opinion on sexuality and religion. The research was conducted on 375 French students’ sample, aged 18 to 23 in the second year of Bachelor's degree in Humanities and Social Sciences within a control environment of documentary research, discursive production, and audiovisual creativity. The experience took place over two consecutive years, respectively, 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. The experiment was based on three distinct explorations corresponding to distinct individual cognitive experiences aimed at the representation, expression and meaning of the intimate limits assigned by students to public display through the mediatization of sexuality and religion. The opinion of French students on the mediatization of intimate sphere in view of their passive participation within the construction of this opinion feeds two scenarios: privatization of the public sphere and commodification of the intimate sphere.

Nola aipatu

Tudor, M.-A., & Bratosin, S. (2020). Sexuality and religion in the public sphere. Opinions of French students on mediatization of intimate sphere. Zer - Komunikazio Ikasketen Aldizkaria, 25(49). https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.21612
Abstract 439 | PDF (English) Downloads 74

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Amiraux, V. (2018). Citoyens, piété et démocratie. Réflexions sur l’occultation des corps croyants, l’intimité et le droit au secret. Social Compass, 65(2), 168-186.

Atifi, H., & Touati, Z. (2020). Nouvelles revendications féministes et médias numériques. Contournement des interdits sociaux et religieux en Tunisie et Maroc. ESSACHESS – Journal for Communication Studies 13(25), 179–208, https://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/485/498.

Bauman Z. (2013), La vie liquide. Paris: Fayard.

Becta. (2003). What the research says about digital video and teaching and learning. http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/wtrs_digitalvideo.pdf

Bellerose, M. (2008). De la religion dans la sphère publique: Déprivatisation de la religion ou publicisation du privé? Franciscanum. Revista de las ciencias del espíritu, 50(149), 63-93.

Berrebi-Hoffmann, I. (2010). Les métamorphoses de l'intime: Repenser les relations entre le public et le privé au travail. Empan, 77(1), 13-17. doi:10.3917/empa.077.0013.

Bonicco, C. (2006). Goffman et l’ordre de l’interaction: un exemple de sociologie compréhensive. Philonsorbonne, 48(129), 31-48.

Bowen, F., & Blackmon, K. (2003). Spirals of silence: The dynamic effects of diversity on organizational voice. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1393-1417.

Bratosin, S. (2001). La concertation: forme symbolique de l'action collective. Paris: L'Harmattan.

Bratosin, S. (2018). Medializaçao, espirito pos-neoprotestante e etica do capitalismo afetivo. In Ferreira J et al. (Eds.), Entre o que se diz e o que se pensa : onde està a midiatizaçao (pp. 189-219). Santa Maria-RS: Facos-Ufsm. http://midiaticom.org/files/entreoquesedizeoquesepensa.pdf

Carver, T., & Mottier, V. (1998). Politics of sexuality: Identity, gender, citizenship (Vol. 4). UK: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science.

Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago/London. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Cassirer, E. (1972). La philosophie des formes symboliques: La phénoménologie de la connaissance. Paris: Minuit.

Cassirer, E. (1975). Essai sur l’homme. Paris: Minuit.

Dubois, E., Gruzd, A., & Jacobson, J. (2018). Journalists’ use of social media to infer public opinion: The Citizens’ Perspective. Social Science Computer Review, 36, Online first, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318791527

Dutertre, M. (2013). Collusions. Paris: Du Panthéon.

Dragoman, D. (2011). Activisme civique, protestation et contextes politiques. Comparer la Roumanie et la Suisse. Sociologie Romaneasca, 9(3), 121-140.

Ebstyne King, P. (2003). Religion and identity: The role of ideological, social, and spiritual contexts. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 197-204.

Ergler, C. (2011). Beyond Passive Participation: Children as Collaborators in Understanding Neighbourhood Experience. Graduate Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 7(2), 78-98.

Franco, A. & Marques Vieira, R. (2018). Educating for critical thinking in university: The criticality of critical thinking in education and everyday life. Essachess. Journal for Communication Studies, 11(22), 131-144. http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/429/463

Gauchet, M. (1998). La religion dans la démocratie. Parcours de la laïcité. Paris: Gallimard.

Gefen, D., Ragowsky, A., & Ridings, C. (2008). Leadership and justice: increasing non participating users’ assessment of an IT through passive participation. Information & Management, 45(8), 507-512.

Gero, J. S., & Maher, M. L. (2013). Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design. UK: Psychology Press.

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy-sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Glynn, C. J. et al. (1997). Perceived support for one's opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the" spiral of silence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452-463.

Goffman, E. (1988). L’ordre de l’interaction. Les moments et leurs hommes. Paris: Minuit.

Hayes, A. F. (2007). Exploring the forms of self‐censorship: On the Spiral of Silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 785-802.

Hoover, S. M. (2003). Religion, media and identity: Theory and method in audience research on religion and media. In Mediated Religion: Conversations in media, religion and culture (pp. 9-19). New York: T&T Clark.

Honneth, A. (1992). Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konfiikte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Hornsby, J. (2007). A disjunctive conception of acting for reasons. In A. Haddock & F. MacPherson (Eds.), Disjunctivism: perception, action, knowledge (pp. 244-261). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hubbard, P. (2001). Sex zones: Intimacy, citizenship and public space. Sexualities, 4(1), 51-71.

Hunsberger, B., Pratt, M., & Pancer, S. M. (2001). Adolescent identity formation: Religious exploration and commitment. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 365–386.

Johansson, T. (2016). The transformation of sexuality: Gender and identity in contemporary youth culture. UK: Routledge.

Juszczyk, S. (2004). Media influence on children and adolescents. The New Educational Review, 2(3), 93-112.

Kim, M. (2016). Facebook's Spiral of Silence and participation: The Role of political expression on Facebook and partisan strength in political participation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(12), 696-702.

Livingstone, S. (2009). On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1-18.

Lövheim, M. (2013). Young people, religious identity, and the internet. In Religion Online (pp. 67-82). UK: Routledge.

Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., & Arthur, L. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: University Press.

McDevitt, M. et al. (2003). Spiral of Moderation: Opinion Expression in Computer-Mediated Discussion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(4), 454-470.

Mehl, D. (1996). La télévision de l’intimité. Paris: Seuil.

Messina, A. (2018). La violence sexuelle après Hollywood. Esprit, avril(4), 33-36.

Meyer, M. D. (2013). Media, Sexuality and Identity: Thoughts on the Role Text, Audience and Production Play in Cultural Discourse. Sexuality & Culture, 17(3), 379-383.

Mininni, G., Ghiglione, R. & Sales-Wuillemin, E. (1995). The intralocutor's diatextual frame. Journal of Pragmatics, 24(5), 471-487.

Moran, L. J. (2017). Sexuality and identity. UK: Routledge.

Muxel, A. (2015). La politisation par l’intime: Parler politique avec ses proches. Revue Française de
Science Politique, 65(4), 541-562.

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The Spiral of Silence a Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.

Olivier, A.P. (2015) La théorie de la reconnaissance : un modèle critique pour l’éducation ? In M. Fabre & C. Gohier (Eds.) Les valeurs éducatives au risque du néo-libéralisme (pp. 79-90). Rouen et Havre: PURH.

Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2018). La compétence numérique de gestion des frontières sur les réseaux sociaux numériques : un capital culturel technologique à la Bourdieu. Lien Social et Politiques, 81, 121–137.

Oppong, S. H. (2013). Religion and identity. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(6), 10-16.

Post, R. C. (2000). Three concepts of privacy. Geo. LJ, 89, 2087-2098.

Ricœur, P. (1986). Du texte à l’action: Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris : Seuil.

Richardson, D. (1998). Sexuality and citizenship. Sociology, 32(1), 83-100.

Sabat, J. (2019). Sociologie, normativité et problèmes sociaux: Quelle place pour la critique? Essachess. Journal for Communication Studies, 12(23), 167-185. http://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/449/477

Sauvaget, D. & Skrzypek, C. (2010). Secret partagé et préservation de l'intime. Empan, 77(1), 58-61. doi:10.3917/empa.077.0058.

Spinner-Halev, J. (2000). Surviving diversity: Religion and democratic citizenship. Baltimore MD: JHU Press.

Stoycheff, E. (2016). Under surveillance: Examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA Internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 296-311.

Strauss, L. A. (1992). Miroirs et masques. Une introduction à l'interactionnisme. Paris: A.-M. Métailié.

Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P. M., & Tynes, B. (2004). Constructing sexuality and identity in an online teen chat room. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 651-666.

Tudor, M.A., & Bratosin, S. (2020). Croire en la technologie : médiatisation du futur et futur de la médiatisation. Revue Communication, 37(1), 1-16, https://journals.openedition.org/communication/11021.

Underwood, G. F. (2019). Sex, education and influence on body image and identity. Georgia Journal of Science, 77(1), 59.

Urban, J., & Bulkow, K. (2013). Tracing public opinion online–an example of use for social network analysis in communication research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 100, 108-126.

Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441-458.

Weeks, J., Maudet M., & Thomé, C. (2015). La sexualité est forcément politique. Entretien avec Jeffrey Weeks. Genre, Sexualité & Société, 14, 1-18.

Wei-dong, H., Qian, W., & Jie, C. (2018). Tracing public opinion propagation and emotional evolution based on public emergencies in social networks. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 13(1), 129-142.

White, A. E., Moeller, J., Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. A. (2018). Gender identity and sexual identity labels used by U.S. high school students: A co-occurrence network analysis. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(2), 243-252.

Zhang, L. et al. (2018). The research on social networks public opinion propagation influence models and its controllability. China Communications, 15(7), 98-110.
Atala
Artikuluak