Dinámica de las Redes Virtuales de Fabricación Global en la Industria Aeronáutica
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Resumen
Las redes virtuales de fabricación global (RVFGs) están formadas por empresas independientes las cuales establecen entre sí relaciones de tipo horizontal y vertical, pudiendo incluso ser competidores, donde no es necesario mantener internamente grandes recursos fabriles sino gestionar y compartir eficientemente los recursos de la red. Sin embargo, los riesgos inherentes de estas redes de colaboración, entre OEMs competidores y proveedores también son numerosos. Para evitar esto, los OEMs utilizan una serie de mecanismos estructurales como los posicionamientos centralizados en la red o el uso de los agujeros estructurales para así conseguir mantener un poder tácito en la RVFG. Este trabajo demostrará cómo se gestiona el poder en estas organizaciones y la importancia de estos mecanismos mediante un estudio cuantitativo en uno de los sectores donde más han crecido las RVFGs, la industria de fabricación de motores aeronáuticos.
Cómo citar
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Redes virtuales de fabricación global, agujeros estructurales, industria aeronáutica
ARRUÑADA, B. y VÁZQUEZ, X. (2006): “When your contract manufacturer becomes your competitor”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, No. 9, pp. 135-145.
BEUGELSDIJK, S.; KOEN, C. y NOORDERHAVEN, N. (2009): “A dyadic approach to the impact of differences in organizational culture on relationship performance”, Industrial Marketing Management 38, 312–323.
BONACCORSI, A. y GIURI, P. (2000): “When shakeout doesn’t occur. The evolution of the turboprop engine industry”, Research Policy 29, 847–870.
BRASS, D. J. y BURKHARDT, M. E. (1992): “Centrality and power in organizations”. In N. Nohria and R. Eccles eds., Networks and Organizations: 191-215. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
BURT, R. (1992): “Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition”. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
CAMARINHA-MATOS L.M.; AFSARMANESH H.; GALEANO N. y MOLINA A. (2009): “Collaborative networked organizations – Concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, pp 46–60.
CAMM, J.D.; CHORMAN, T.R.; DILL, F.A.; DENNIS J.R.; SWEENEY, J.; GLENN, H. y WEGRYN, W. (1997): “Blending OR/MS, judgment, and GIS: Restructuring P&G’s supply chain”, Interfaces 27(1), pp 128–142.
CHEN, X. P. y YAO, X. (2003): “Sustaining cooperation in public goods dilemmas: Effects of motivational explanations and sanctions”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle.
COX, D.R. y SNELL E.J. (1989): “Analysis of binary data (2nd edition)”, London: Chapman & Hall.
DITTRICH, K.; DUYSTERS, G. y MAND A. (2007): “Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks: The case of IBM”, Research Policy 36, 1496–1511
DOZ Y.L. y HAMEL G. (1998): “Alliance Advantage”. Harvard Business Press, 1998
DUSSAUGE, P. y GARRETTE, B. (1995): “Determinants of Success in International Strategic Alliances: Evidence from the Global Aerospace Industry”. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3 pp. 505-530. Palgrave Macmillan Journals
ESPOSITO, E. (2004): “Strategic alliances and internationalisation in the aircraft manufacturing industry”. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 71, pp 443–468
GRANOVETTER, M. (1985): “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”. The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 481-510
GULATI, R. y GARGIULO, M. (1999): “Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From? ”. The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 104, No. 5, pp. 1439-1493
GULATI, R. y SYTCH, M. (2008): “Does Familiarity Breed Trust? Revisiting the Antecedents of Trust”, Managerial and Decision Economics, vol 29, pp 165-190.
HOFSTEDE, G. (2009): “The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories”, Perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, 1589.
HOOPES, D.G.; MADSEN, T.L. y WALKER, G. (2003): “Guest Editors Introduction to the Special Issue: Why is There a Resource-Based View? Toward a Theory of Competitive Heterogeneity”. Strategic Management Journal; 24, pp.889-902.
JIAO, J.R.; XIAO Y.; ARUN, K. (2006): “An agent-based framework for collaborative negotiation in the global manufacturing supply chain network”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 22, pp 239–255
JOHANSEN, K. y COMSTOCK, M. (2005): “Coordination in collaborative manufacturing mega-networks: A case study”. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Volume 22, Nº 3, pp. 226-244.
LEE, H.L. y BILLINGTON, C. (1995): “The evolution of supply-chain management models and practices at Hewlett-Packard”. Interfaces 25, 5, pp. 42–63.
LECHNER, C.; DOWLING, M. y WELPE, I. (2006): “Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix”, Journal of Business Venturing 21, pp. 514– 540
LIU Q. y SHI Y. J. (2008): “Grid manufacturing for cross-enterprise”. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36, pp. 205–212.
NAGELKERKE, N.J. (1991): “A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination”, Biometrika, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 691-692.
NALEBUF B.J. y BRANDENBURGER A.M. (1996): “La competition, une révolution dans la manière de jouer concurrence et cooperation”. Village Mondial, Paris.
PARK S.K. y UNGSON G.R. (2001): “Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure. Organization Science”. Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 37-53
PARK, S.H. y RUSSO, M. (1996): When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of alliance failure. Management Science 42, pp. 875-890.
PORTER, M. (1996): “What is Strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, 74 (6), pp. 61-78.
REAGANS, R.; ZUCKERMAN, E. y MCEVILY, B. (2003): “How to make the team? Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective projects”, Working paper, Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
RUDBERG, M. y OLHAGER, J. (2008): “Global operations strategy: Coordinating manufacturing networks”. Omega 36, pp. 91 – 106
RUDBERG, M. y WEST, B.M. (2001): “The bright light: Ericsson’s way to transnationality”, Working paper WP-265. Department of production economics, LinkVoping Institute of Technology, LinkVoping, 2001.
SHI, Y.; FLEET, D. y GREGORY, M. (2005): “Global Manufacturing Virtual Network and its Position in Manufacturing Systems”. The 7th Annual International Manufacturing Symposium, Institute for Manufacturing, Dept. of Engineering, University of Cambridge
SHI, Y. y GREGORY, M.J. (2001): “Global Manufacturing Virtual Network (GMVN): a new manufacturing system for market agility and global mobility”. International Working Conference on Strategic Manufacturing, Aalborg, Denmark.
STUART, T.E. (1998): “Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 668-698
STURGEON, J. (2002): “Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization”. Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 11, Number 3, pp. 451-496
TSAI, W. (2001): “Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp. 996-1004.
VILANA, J. R. y RODRÍGUEZ-MONROY C. (2009): “Let Others Manufacture! Towards A New Manufacturing Framework”. Intangible Capital. ISSN: 1697-9818 Vol 5, No 4, pp. 347-369.
WILLIAMS, T.; ELLIS, B.; MAULL, R. y GREGORY, M. (2001): “Offset Strategies in the Global Aerospace Sector”. In the Proceedings of the 6th Research Symposium on International Manufacturing: Global Integration. ISBN 1-902546-23-7, Churchill College, Cambridge, 9th 11th September, pp. 153-166
ZENG, M. y CHEN, X.P. (2003): “Achieving Cooperation in Multiparty Alliances: A Social Dilemma Approach to Partnership Management”. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 587-605
Los autores mantienen el copyright de la publicación. Las publicaciones en Cuadernos de Gestión se distribuyen bajo la licencia de Creative Commons -CC-BY-NC-ND, garantizando el acceso abierto a toda la sociedad.
En concreto la licencia CC-BY-NC-ND permite utilización, copia, distribución y comunicación pública de la obra, siempre que los autores y la fuente sean correctamente citados y no se utilice para propósitos comerciales.
El/la autor/a puede hacer libre uso de su artículo indicando siempre que el texto ha sido publicado en Management Letters/Cuadernos de Gestión y cualquier re-edición del mismo deberá contar con la autorización de la revista.