Factores en el liderazgo emprendedor: un análisis bibliométrico durante el periodo 2000-2020

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Publicado 11-05-2022
Sofia Aparisi-Torrijo
Gabriela Ribes-Giner

Resumen

Este estudio presenta una visión general de la investigación sobre los factores, atributos o comportamientos de liderazgo en el emprendimiento a través de un exhaustivo análisis bibliométrico. Se extrajeron del año 2000 a diciembre de 2020, 1594 documentos de la colección principal de la base de datos Web of Science, y se analizaron a través de un estudio bibliométrico utilizando los métodos del análisis de rendimiento y el mapeo científico. Para evaluar la importancia, el impacto y la calidad de las publicaciones se usaron indicadores como la productividad, el número de citas o el índice-h, entre otros, obteniendo un análisis de tendencias y avances sobre las publicaciones, autores, revistas y países más relevantes. Además, se complementó el análisis gracias a una cartografía científica obtenida mediante técnicas de co-citaciones, acoplamientos bibliográficos, co-ocurrencias y co-autorías.  Los resultados muestran que la tendencia de publicación aumenta significativamente a partir de 2015 y es en 2020, cuando se registra la mayor productividad. Estados Unidos e Inglaterra figuran entre los más países más publicadores e influyentes, aunque un análisis de la red revela cooperaciones entre diferentes países. Aunque la revista más productiva es Sustainability, la más influyente es Journal of Business Venturing. Además, el análisis de palabras clave revela que el término “liderazgo emprendedor” se comienza a utilizar por derecho propio entorno al 2018 como media. Este mapeo sistemático ayuda a ilustrar la evolución temporal de la investigación, identificar las áreas de interés actual para usarla en marcos teóricos y empíricos, y proporcionar una sólida hoja de ruta para la investigación futura.

Cómo citar

Aparisi-Torrijo, S., & Ribes-Giner, G. (2022). Factores en el liderazgo emprendedor: un análisis bibliométrico durante el periodo 2000-2020. Cuadernos De Gestión, 22(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211456sa
Abstract 131 | PDF (English) Downloads 69

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Análisis bibliométrico, Liderazgo Emprendedor Entrepreneurial, Factores de liderazgo, Emprendimiento, Co-citación

References
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F., 2009. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
Baier-Fuentes, H., Hormiga, E., Miravitlles, P. and Blanco-Mesa, F., 2019. International entrepreneurship: A critical review of the research field. European Journal of International Management, 13(3),381-412. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2019.099427.
Blanco-Mesa, F., Merigó, J. M. and Gil-Lafuente, A. M., 2017. Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32(3), 2033-2050. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS161640.
Bonilla, C. A., Merigó, J. M. and Torres-Abad, C., 2015. Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1239-1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1747-7.
Boyack, K. and Klavans, R., 2010. Co-Citation Analysis, Bibliographic Coupling, and Direct Citation: Which Citation Approach Represents the Research Front Most Accurately?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 12(61)(december), 2389- 2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.
Braun, T., Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A., 2006. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4.
Broadus, R. N., 1987. Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. School of Library Science, 12, 373-379.
Cancino, C., Merigó, J. M., Coronado, F., Dessouky, Y. and Dessouky, M., 2017. Forty years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A bibliometric analysis. Computers and Industrial Engineering. Elsevier Ltd, 113, 614-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.033.
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F., 2011. Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study AmongTools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.
Cogliser, C. C. and Brigham, K. H., 2004. The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship : Mutual lessons to be learned. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 771-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.004.
Van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L., 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Ellegaard, O. and Wallin, J. A., 2015. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics. Springer Netherlands, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.
Fernald, L., Solomon, G.T. and Tarabishy, A., 2005. A New Paradigm: Entrepreneurial Leadership. International Research Journal, 30(2), 257-276
Gálvez, C., 2016. Visualización de las principales líneas de investigación en salud pública: un análisis basado en mapas bibliométricos aplicados a la Revista Española de Salud Pública (2006-2015). Revista Española de Salud Pública, 90(e40028), e1-e10. Available at: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1135-57272016000100426&lng=es&tlng=es.%0A.
Garfield, E., 1972. Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Science 178, 417-479. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v20n02_05.
Gaviria-Marín, M., 2021. Bibliometrics and business. A challenge for researchers. Inquietud Empresarial, 21(1), I-III. Available at: https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/inquietud_empresarial/article/view/12931.
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M. and Baier-Fuentes, H., 2019. Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Elsevier, 140(July 2018), 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006.
Guan, J. and Gao, X., 2008. Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1871-0.
Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C. and Surie, G., 2004. Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00040-5.
Harrison, C. and Burnard, K., 2016. Entrepreneurial leadership: A Systematic Literature Review. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 235-264. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331589807.
Harrison, C., Burnard, K. and Paul, S., 2018. Entrepreneurial leadership in a developing economy: a skill-based analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(3), 521-548. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2017-0160.
Harrison, C., Paul, S. and Burnard, K., 2016. Entrepreneurial leadership in retail pharmacy: developing economy perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(3), 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL01-2015-0004
Harrison, R. T., Leitch, C. M. and Mcadam, M., 2015. Breaking Glass: Toward a Gendered Analysis of Entrepreneurial Leadership. Journal of Small Business Management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 53(3), 693-713. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12180.
Hejazi, S. A. M., Maleki, M. M. and Naeiji, M. J., 1993. Designing a Scale for Measuring Entrepreneurial Leadership in SMEs. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 29(3), 1006-1010. https://doi.org/10.1109/3.206585.
Henry, C., Foss, L. and Ahl, H., 2016. Gender and entrepreneurship research: A review of methodological approaches*. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 34(3), 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614549779.
Hirsch, J. E., 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
Kapil, P. and Salgotra, P., 2018. Entrepreneurial Leadership: A Methodical Critique of the Evidences and Literature. Pacific Business Review International, 11(1), 17-24.
Karpinskaia, E. and Shirokova, G., 2019. Entrepreneurial leadership: approaches to concept definition and main research directions. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского Университета. Менеджмент, 18(2), 235-260.
Kempster, S. and Cope, J., 2010. Learning to lead in the entrepreneurial context. Team Performance Management, 5-34.
Kessler, M. M., 1963. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Kuratko, D. F., 2007. Entrepreneurial Leadership in the 21st Century. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130040201.
Leitch, C. M. and Harrison, R. T., 2018. The evolving field of entrepreneurial leadership: An overview. Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship and Leadership, 3-34. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783473762.00006.
Leitch, C. M., Mcmullan, C. and Harrison, R. T., 2013. The Development of Entrepreneurial Leadership: The Role of Human, Social and Institutional Capital. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00808.x.
Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F. and Zeng, X. J., 2018. A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166.
Lippitt, G. L., 1987. Entrepreneurial leadership: A performing art. Journal of Creative Behavior, 21, 264-70.
Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G., 1996. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
Martínez, M. A., Herrera, M., Contreras, E., Ruíz, A. and Herrera-Viedma, E., 2014. Characterizing highly cited papers in Social Work through H-Classics. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1713-1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1460-y.
Merigó, J. M., Gil-Lafuente, A. M. and Yager, R. R., 2015. An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Applied Soft Computing Journal. Elsevier B.V., 27, 420-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.035.
Merigó, J. M., Pedrycz, W., Weber, R. and De la Sotta, C., 2018. Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Information Sciences, 432, 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054.
Merigó, J. M. and Yang, J. B., 2017. Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12109.
Ng, H. S., Kee, D. M. H. and Ramayah, T., 2016. The role of transformational leadership, entrepreneurial and technical competence. Journal of General Management, 42(1), 23-43.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. and Podsakoff, N. P., 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Pritchard, A., 1969. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 35, 348-349
Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L. and Brännback, M., 2015. Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086.
Schubert, A., 2007. Successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 70(1), 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0112-x.
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S., 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp. 217-226.
Simba, A. and Thai, M. T. T., 2019. Advancing Entrepreneurial Leadership as a Practice in MSME Management and Development. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(S2), 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12481.
Small, H., 1973. Co-citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 4(24), p. 265.
Thongpapanl, N., 2012. The changing landscape of technology and innovation management: An updated ranking of journals in the field. Technovation. Elsevier, 32(5), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.001.
Vallaster, C., Kraus, S., Merigó Lindahl, J. M. and Nielsen, A., 2019. Ethics and entrepreneurship: A bibliometric study and literature review. Journal of Business Research. Elsevier, 99(February), 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.050.
Vecchio, R. P., 2003. Entrepreneurship and leadership: Common trends and common threads, Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 303-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00019-6.
Wallin, J. A., 2005. Bibliometric methods: Pitfalls and possibilities. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 97(5), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x.
Wang, J., 2013. Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94(3), 851-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9.
White, H. D. and Griffith, B. C., 1981. Author cocitation: A literatura measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302.
Zaragoza-Ibarra, A., Merigó, J. M. and Alfaro-Calderón, G. G., 2021. Bibliometric analysis of innovation in Mexico. Inquietud Empresarial, 21(1), 75-101. Available at: https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/inquietud_empresarial/article/view/11474.
Zupic, I. and Čater, T., 2015. Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Sección
Artículos