Legitimidad en el emprendimiento. Estructura intelectual y tendencias de investigación
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado
11-02-2022
Virginia Gordo-Molina
Francisco Diez-Martin
Cristina Del-Castillo-Feito
Doctoranda de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas. Paseo de los Artilleros S/N, 28032 Madrid (España). Profesora en el RCU. Escorial - María Cristina (Adscrito UCM). Paseo de los Alamillos 2, 28200 San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Madrid (España)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-6751
Francisco Diez-Martin
Profesor asociado del Departamento de Economía de la Empresa. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas. Paseo de los Artilleros S/N, 28032 Madrid (España)
Cristina Del-Castillo-Feito
Profesora del Departamento de Economía de la Empresa. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas. Paseo de los Artilleros S/N, 28032 Madrid (España)
Resumen
Desde principios del siglo xxi, la investigación sobre la legitimidad organizacional se ha utilizado con frecuencia para explicar la supervivencia de las nuevas empresas. La necesidad de ser consideradas legitimas las nuevas empresas para mejorar su acceso a los recursos necesarios para sobrevivir ha llamado la atención de los investigadores. Esta situación ha favorecido el aumento de la investigación sobre la legitimidad organizacional en el campo del emprendimiento, lo que ha aumentado la complejidad de obtener una comprensión global de la situación actual en el campo. El objetivo de esta investigación es identificar y visualizar la estructura intelectual de la investigación y las tendencias emergentes en el campo de la legitimidad organizacional en el emprendimiento. La base de datos está formada por las fuentes de conocimiento o referencias en que se basan los artículos científicos publicados en la base de datos de Web of Science (WOS). Mediante una metodología bibliométrica basada en co-citas, identificamos las principales áreas de investigación, las más activas, los principales contribuyentes, las vías de difusión y las tendencias emergentes en el campo de la investigación. Este trabajo de investigación contribuye al desarrollo del campo de la legitimidad organizacional en el emprendimiento ofreciendo una visión integral de la situación de este dominio, tanto un punto de partida como una base teórica para que los investigadores construyan nuevos desarrollos.
Cómo citar
Gordo-Molina, V., Diez-Martin, F., & Del-Castillo-Feito, C. (2022). Legitimidad en el emprendimiento. Estructura intelectual y tendencias de investigación. Cuadernos De Gestión, 22(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211471vg
- APA
- Chicago
- Harvard Descargar cita
- Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
- BibTeX
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
Legitimidad organizacional, Emprendimiento, Negocios, Nuevas empresas, Negocios emergentes, Análisis bibliométrico
References
Ahlers, G. K. C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. In The Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107. https://doi. org/10.5465/19416520903053598
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.893615
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Kaiser, D. I., & Kaur, J. (2009). Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 210–221.
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation and status. In The Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151-179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29765019
Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amr.2013.0318
Burton, M. D., & Beckman, C. M. (2007). Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 239-266. https://doi. org/10.1177/000312240707200206
Busenitz, L. W., Plummer, L. A., Klotz, A. C., Shahzad, A., & Rhoads, K. (2014). Entrepreneurship Research (1985-2009) and the Emergence of Opportunities. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(5), 981-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12120
Calic, G., & Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking Off Social Entrepreneur-ship: How A Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201
Chaney, D., & Martin, D. (2017). The Role of Shared Values in Understanding Loyalty over Time. Journal of Travel Research, 56(4), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516643411
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3),359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
Chen, C., Chen, Y., Horowitz, M., Hou, H., Liu, Z., & Pellegrino, D. (2009). Towards an Explanatory and Computational Theory of Scientific Discovery. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 191-209.
Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
Chen, C., & Kuljis, J. (2003). The rising landscape: A visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 435-446. https:// doi.org/10.1002/asi.10229
Chen, X. P., Yao, X., & Kotha, S. (2009). Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.36462018
Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363-376. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001
Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4),573-596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272294
Clarke, J. S., Cornelissen, J. P., & Healey, M. P. (2019). Actions speak louder than words: How figurative language and gesturing in entrepreneurial pitches influences investment judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 335-360. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2016.1008
Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381
Cornelius, B., Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375-398. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00125.x
Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265-290. https://doi. org/10.1111/etap.12267
Cruz-Suárez, A., Marino, D., & Prado-Román, C. (2020). Origin and evolution of the legitimacy management in higher education. Journal of Management and Business Education, 3(2), 93-108. https:// doi.org/10.35564/JMBE.2020.0007
Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6
Deeds, D. L., Decarolis, D., & Coombs, J. E. (1997). The impact of firm-specific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0883-9026(97)84970-1
Deephouse, D.L., Bundy, J., Tost, P. L., & Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational Legitimacy: Six Key Questions. In R Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 27-52). SAGE Publications Ltd, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n2
Deephouse, David L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024-1039. https://doi.org/10.2307/256722
Deephouse, David L, & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 49-77). SAGE Publications Ltd, London. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781849200387.n2
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00037-5
Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2021). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1007-1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00380-6
Durand, R., & Paolella, L. (2013). Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1100-1123. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01039.x
Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2393494
Fisher, G. (2020). The Complexities of New Venture Legitimacy. Organization Theory, 1, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720913881
Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383-409. https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496
Fisher, G., Kuratko, D. F., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017). Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.005
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. (2014). Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy, 43(7), 1177-1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.015
Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), 1479-1492. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.2014.0915
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Glynn, M. A., & Navis, C. (2013). Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124-1137. https://doi. org/10.1111/joms.12023
Granqvist, N., Grodal, S., & Woolley, J. L. (2013). Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organization Science, 24(2), 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.1120.0748
Greenwood, Royston, & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. In The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27-48.
Greenwood, Royston, Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80.
Hallen, B. L. (2008). The Causes and Consequences of the Initial Network Positions of New Organizations: From Whom Do Entrepreneurs Receive Investments? Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(4), 685-718. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.4.685
Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 476-501. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094872
Hoefer, R. L., & Green, S. E. (2016). A rhetorical model of institutional decision making: The role of rhetoric in the formation and change of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 130-150. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0330
Horisch, J. (2015). Crowdfunding for environmental ventures: An empirical analysis of the influence of environmental orientation on the success of crowdfunding initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 636-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.046
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
Ji, Y. G., Tao, W., & Rim, H. (2021). Theoretical Insights of CSR Research in Communication from 1980 to 2018: A Bibliometric Network Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04748-w
Kim, M. C., & Chen, C. (2015). A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems. Scientometrics, 104(1), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1595-5
Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and Hierarchical Structure in Streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7(4), 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024940629314
Lee, B. H., Hiatt, S. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2017). Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organization Science, 28(3), 447-470. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.2017.1126
Lehner, O. M., & Nicholls, A. (2014). Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: a public-private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital, 16(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.925305
Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078111
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.188
Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2006). The emergence of new global institutions: A discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 27(1), 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606061807
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679. https:// doi.org/10.2307/20159610
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
Moral-Munoz, J. A., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2019). In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmosch, & M. Thewall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, 159-185. Springer International Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_7
Nagy, B., Rutherford, M., Truong, Y., & Pollack, J. (2017). Development of the legitimacy threshold scale. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 27(3), 50-58. http://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/ view/763
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.61031809
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439-471. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439
O’Neil, I., & Ucbasaran, D. (2016). Balancing “what matters to me” with “what matters to them”: Exploring the legitimation process of environmental entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.12.001
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses To Processes Institutional. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002
Ozcan, P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009). Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 246-279. https://doi.org/10.5465/ AMJ.2009.37308021
Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972-1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2011.0405
Pollack, J. M., Rutherford, M. W., & Nagy, B. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915-939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00531.x
Pollock, T., & Rindova, V. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631-642.
Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132-1205. https://doi.org/10.1086/421508
R. K. Yin. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods Sixth Edition. In Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795-843. https://doi. org/10.1086/367917
Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S. (2001). Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. AcademyofManagement Journal, 44(6), 1263-1280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069400
Ruebottom, T. (2013). The microstructures of rhetorical strategy in social entrepreneurship: Building legitimacy through heroes and villains. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.05.001
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009). Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields. In The Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 643-671.
Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00126.x
Schultz, P. L., Marin, A., & Boal, K. B. (2014). The impact of media on the legitimacy of new market categories: The case of broadband internet. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 34-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.11.001
Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222-247. https://doi.org/10.5465/ AMR.2002.6588004
Servantie, V., Cabrol, M., Guieu, G., & Boissin, J. P. (2016). L’entrepreneuriat international est-il un champ? Une analyse bibliométrique de la littérature (1989–2015). Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 168-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-015-0162-8
Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280
Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). A New Venture’s Cognitive Legitimacy: An Assessment by Customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627x.00073
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2007). Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 872-882. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20529
Singh, J. J. V. J., Tucker, D. D. J. D., & House, R. R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392787
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451-478. https://doi.org/10.5465/an-nals.2015.0101
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35-67. https://doi. org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
Uberbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of New Ventures: A Review and Research Programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 667-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12077
van Werven, R., Bouwmeester, O., & Cornelissen, J. P. (2015). The power of arguments: How entrepreneurs convince stakeholders of the legitimate distinctiveness of their ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 616-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.08.001
Vergne, J. P., & Wry, T. (2014). Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1), 56-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12044
Wry, T., & York, J. G. (2017). An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 437-460. https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.2013.0506
Zamparini, A., & Lurati, F. (2016). Being different and being the same: Multimodal image projection strategies for a legitimate distinctive identity. Strategic Organization, 1476127016638811-. https://doi. org/10.1177/1476127016638811
Zhang, Y., & Biniari, M. G. (2021). Forging a collective entrepreneurial identity within existing organizations through corporate venturing. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 27(6), 1502-1525. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-08-2019-0492
Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2589
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.2002.7389921
Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. (2007). How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.70
Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. In The Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107. https://doi. org/10.5465/19416520903053598
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.893615
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Kaiser, D. I., & Kaur, J. (2009). Scientific discovery and topological transitions in collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 210–221.
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation and status. In The Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151-179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29765019
Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amr.2013.0318
Burton, M. D., & Beckman, C. M. (2007). Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 239-266. https://doi. org/10.1177/000312240707200206
Busenitz, L. W., Plummer, L. A., Klotz, A. C., Shahzad, A., & Rhoads, K. (2014). Entrepreneurship Research (1985-2009) and the Emergence of Opportunities. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(5), 981-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12120
Calic, G., & Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking Off Social Entrepreneur-ship: How A Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201
Chaney, D., & Martin, D. (2017). The Role of Shared Values in Understanding Loyalty over Time. Journal of Travel Research, 56(4), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516643411
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3),359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
Chen, C., Chen, Y., Horowitz, M., Hou, H., Liu, Z., & Pellegrino, D. (2009). Towards an Explanatory and Computational Theory of Scientific Discovery. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 191-209.
Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
Chen, C., & Kuljis, J. (2003). The rising landscape: A visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 435-446. https:// doi.org/10.1002/asi.10229
Chen, X. P., Yao, X., & Kotha, S. (2009). Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.36462018
Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363-376. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001
Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4),573-596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272294
Clarke, J. S., Cornelissen, J. P., & Healey, M. P. (2019). Actions speak louder than words: How figurative language and gesturing in entrepreneurial pitches influences investment judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 335-360. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2016.1008
Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381
Cornelius, B., Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375-398. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00125.x
Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265-290. https://doi. org/10.1111/etap.12267
Cruz-Suárez, A., Marino, D., & Prado-Román, C. (2020). Origin and evolution of the legitimacy management in higher education. Journal of Management and Business Education, 3(2), 93-108. https:// doi.org/10.35564/JMBE.2020.0007
Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6
Deeds, D. L., Decarolis, D., & Coombs, J. E. (1997). The impact of firm-specific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0883-9026(97)84970-1
Deephouse, D.L., Bundy, J., Tost, P. L., & Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational Legitimacy: Six Key Questions. In R Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 27-52). SAGE Publications Ltd, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n2
Deephouse, David L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024-1039. https://doi.org/10.2307/256722
Deephouse, David L, & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 49-77). SAGE Publications Ltd, London. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781849200387.n2
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00037-5
Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2021). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1007-1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00380-6
Durand, R., & Paolella, L. (2013). Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1100-1123. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01039.x
Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2393494
Fisher, G. (2020). The Complexities of New Venture Legitimacy. Organization Theory, 1, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720913881
Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383-409. https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496
Fisher, G., Kuratko, D. F., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017). Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.005
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. (2014). Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy, 43(7), 1177-1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.015
Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), 1479-1492. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.2014.0915
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Glynn, M. A., & Navis, C. (2013). Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124-1137. https://doi. org/10.1111/joms.12023
Granqvist, N., Grodal, S., & Woolley, J. L. (2013). Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organization Science, 24(2), 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.1120.0748
Greenwood, Royston, & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. In The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27-48.
Greenwood, Royston, Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80.
Hallen, B. L. (2008). The Causes and Consequences of the Initial Network Positions of New Organizations: From Whom Do Entrepreneurs Receive Investments? Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(4), 685-718. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.4.685
Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 476-501. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094872
Hoefer, R. L., & Green, S. E. (2016). A rhetorical model of institutional decision making: The role of rhetoric in the formation and change of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 130-150. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0330
Horisch, J. (2015). Crowdfunding for environmental ventures: An empirical analysis of the influence of environmental orientation on the success of crowdfunding initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 636-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.046
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
Ji, Y. G., Tao, W., & Rim, H. (2021). Theoretical Insights of CSR Research in Communication from 1980 to 2018: A Bibliometric Network Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04748-w
Kim, M. C., & Chen, C. (2015). A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems. Scientometrics, 104(1), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1595-5
Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and Hierarchical Structure in Streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7(4), 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024940629314
Lee, B. H., Hiatt, S. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2017). Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organization Science, 28(3), 447-470. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.2017.1126
Lehner, O. M., & Nicholls, A. (2014). Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: a public-private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital, 16(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.925305
Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078111
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.188
Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2006). The emergence of new global institutions: A discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 27(1), 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606061807
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679. https:// doi.org/10.2307/20159610
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
Moral-Munoz, J. A., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2019). In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmosch, & M. Thewall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, 159-185. Springer International Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_7
Nagy, B., Rutherford, M., Truong, Y., & Pollack, J. (2017). Development of the legitimacy threshold scale. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 27(3), 50-58. http://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/ view/763
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.61031809
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439-471. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439
O’Neil, I., & Ucbasaran, D. (2016). Balancing “what matters to me” with “what matters to them”: Exploring the legitimation process of environmental entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.12.001
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses To Processes Institutional. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002
Ozcan, P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009). Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 246-279. https://doi.org/10.5465/ AMJ.2009.37308021
Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972-1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2011.0405
Pollack, J. M., Rutherford, M. W., & Nagy, B. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915-939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00531.x
Pollock, T., & Rindova, V. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631-642.
Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132-1205. https://doi.org/10.1086/421508
R. K. Yin. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods Sixth Edition. In Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795-843. https://doi. org/10.1086/367917
Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S. (2001). Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. AcademyofManagement Journal, 44(6), 1263-1280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069400
Ruebottom, T. (2013). The microstructures of rhetorical strategy in social entrepreneurship: Building legitimacy through heroes and villains. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.05.001
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009). Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields. In The Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 643-671.
Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00126.x
Schultz, P. L., Marin, A., & Boal, K. B. (2014). The impact of media on the legitimacy of new market categories: The case of broadband internet. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 34-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.11.001
Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222-247. https://doi.org/10.5465/ AMR.2002.6588004
Servantie, V., Cabrol, M., Guieu, G., & Boissin, J. P. (2016). L’entrepreneuriat international est-il un champ? Une analyse bibliométrique de la littérature (1989–2015). Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 168-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-015-0162-8
Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280
Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). A New Venture’s Cognitive Legitimacy: An Assessment by Customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627x.00073
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2007). Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 872-882. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20529
Singh, J. J. V. J., Tucker, D. D. J. D., & House, R. R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392787
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451-478. https://doi.org/10.5465/an-nals.2015.0101
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35-67. https://doi. org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
Uberbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of New Ventures: A Review and Research Programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 667-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12077
van Werven, R., Bouwmeester, O., & Cornelissen, J. P. (2015). The power of arguments: How entrepreneurs convince stakeholders of the legitimate distinctiveness of their ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 616-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.08.001
Vergne, J. P., & Wry, T. (2014). Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1), 56-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12044
Wry, T., & York, J. G. (2017). An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 437-460. https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.2013.0506
Zamparini, A., & Lurati, F. (2016). Being different and being the same: Multimodal image projection strategies for a legitimate distinctive identity. Strategic Organization, 1476127016638811-. https://doi. org/10.1177/1476127016638811
Zhang, Y., & Biniari, M. G. (2021). Forging a collective entrepreneurial identity within existing organizations through corporate venturing. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 27(6), 1502-1525. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-08-2019-0492
Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2589
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.2002.7389921
Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. (2007). How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.70
Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Número
Sección
Artículos
Copyright Information
Los autores mantienen el copyright de la publicación. Las publicaciones en Cuadernos de Gestión se distribuyen bajo la licencia de Creative Commons -CC-BY-NC-ND, garantizando el acceso abierto a toda la sociedad.
En concreto la licencia CC-BY-NC-ND permite utilización, copia, distribución y comunicación pública de la obra, siempre que los autores y la fuente sean correctamente citados y no se utilice para propósitos comerciales.
El/la autor/a puede hacer libre uso de su artículo indicando siempre que el texto ha sido publicado en Management Letters/Cuadernos de Gestión y cualquier re-edición del mismo deberá contar con la autorización de la revista.