Fidem tene, verba seqventvr. retórica y oratoria en la historia eclesiástica de Sócrates Escolástico y Sozomeno
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado
15-09-2015
Alberto J. Quiroga Puertas
Resumen
Este trabajo se centra en las interpretaciones de las apreciaciones estilísticas y de crítica literaria realizadas por los historiadores eclesiásticos Sócrates y Sozomeno en sus descripciones de figuras relevantes de la Iglesia post-Constantiniana. Su valoración del impacto y del papel de la oratoria y la literatura trascendió el campo de la crítica literaria, constituyendo parte del entramado ideológico con el que se juzgaron las creencias religiosas y filiaciones doctrinales de tales figuras en la Iglesia de los siglos iv y v.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Acerbi, S., 2013, «Gregorio de Nacianzo y Paladio de Helenópolis contra los malos obispos: ¿diatriba cínica o "rhetorical display"?», in: J. Torres (ed.), Officia Oratoris. Estrategias de persuasión en la literatura polémica cristiana (ss. I-V), Madrid: Universidad Complutense, 179-199.
Allen, P., 1987, «Some aspects of Hellenism in the early Greek Church Historians», Traditio 43, 368-381. Auksi, P., 1995, Christian Plain Style: the evolution of a spiritual idea, Montreal-London: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Barnes, T. D. and Bevan, G., 2013, The Funerary Speech for John Chrysostom, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Burrus, V., 2000, Begotten not made: conceiving manhood in Late Antiquity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cameron, Av., 1991, Christianity and the Rhetoric of the Empire: the development of Christian discourse, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cameron, Av., 2014, Dialoguing in Late Antiquity, Washington D.C.: Center for Hellenic Studies.
Célérier, P., 2013, L'ombre de l'empereur Julien. Le destin des écrits de Julien chez les auteurs païens et chrétiens du IVe au Vie siècle, Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest.
Cribiore, R., 2013, Libanius the Sophist: rhetoric, reality, and religion in the fourth century, Ithaca: Cornwell University Press.
Dodds, E. R., 1959, Gorgias, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Eshleman, K., 2012, The social world of intellectuals in the Roman Empire: sophists, philosophers, and Christians, Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
Eucken, C., 2001, «Philosophie und Dialektik in der Kirchengeschichte des Sokrates», in: B. Bäbler; H.-G. Nesselrath, and C. Schäublin (eds.), Die Welt des Sokrates von Konstantinopel: Studien zu Politik, Religion und Kultur im späten 4. und frühen 5. Jh. n. Chr., München: K.G. Saur, 96-110.
Fowler, H. N., 1926, Cratylus. Parmenides. Greater Hippias. Lesser Hippias, London: Heinemman. Fredal, J., 1998, Beyond the Fifth Canon: Body Rhetoric in Ancient Greece, PhD.
Gleason, M., 1995, Making Men. Sophist and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goffman, E. 1971, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Penguin.
Grillet, B., Sabbah, G. and Festugière, A.-J., 1983-2008, Sozomen. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Paris: Du Cerf.
Hägg, T., 2006, «Gregory of Nazianzus: A new Lease of Life for the Second Sophistic», in: S. Eklund (ed.), Sunkharmata: Studies in Honour of Jan Fredrik Kindstrand, Uppsala: Uppsala University, 113-127.
Hartrant, C. D., 1890, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. The Ecclesistical History of Socrates Scholasticus, Buffalo: Christian Literature Publishing.
Hoof, L. van, 2013, «Performing Paideia: Greek Culture as an Instrument for Social promotion in the Fourth Century AD», CQ 63.1, 387-406.
Kennedy, G., 1983, Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lamb, W.R.M., 1925, Lysis. Symposium. Gorgias, London: Heinemann.
Leppin, H., 2003, «The Church Historians (I): Socrates, Sozomenus and Theodoretus», in: G. Marasco (ed.), Greek and Roman Historiography in Late Antiquity: fourth to sixth century AD, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 219-254.
Maxwell, J., 2006, Christianization and Communication in Late Antiquity: John Chrysostom and His Congregation in Antioch, Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
Nesselrath, H.-G., 2006, «Sophisten bei Sokrates von Konstantinopel», in: E.Amato (ed.), Approches de la troisième sophistique: hommages à Jacques Schamp, Brussels: Latomus, 179-192.
Nesselrath, H.-G., 2012, Libanios, Hiersemann: Stuttgart.
Nuffelen, P. van, 2004, Un héritage de paix et de piété: etude sur les histoires ecclésiastiques de Socrate et de Sozomène, Leuven: Peeters.
Nuffelen, P. van, 2012, Orosius and the Rhetoric of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nuffelen, P. van, 2014a, «The End of Open Competition? Religious Disputations in Late Antiquity», in: D. Engels and P. Van Nuffelen (eds.), Religion and Competition in Antiquity, Brussels: Latomus, 149-172.
Nuffelen, P. van, 2014b, « A war of words. Sermons and social status in Constantinople under the Theodosian dynasty», in: L. van Hoof and P. van Nuffelen (eds.), Literature and Society in the Fourth Century AD. Performing paideia, constructing the present, presenting the self, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 201-217.
Périchon, P. and Maraval, P., 2004-2007, Socrates. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Paris: Du Cerf.
Pernot, L., 1993, La rhétorique de l'éloge dans le monde gréco-romain, Paris: Institute d'études augustiniennes.
Pernot, L., 2000, La rhétorique dans l' Antiquité, Paris: Poche.
Spuntarelli, C., 2012, Oratore Divino. Linguaggio e rappresentazione retorica nella controversia tra Cappadoci e Anomei, Roma: Istituto Patristico Augustinianum.
Schamp, J., 2006, «Sophistes à l'ambon, esquisses pour la Troisième Sophistique comme paysage littéraire», in: E. Amato (ed.), Approches de la troisième sophistique: hommages à Jacques Schamp, Brussels: Latomus, 286-338.
Urbainczyk, T., 1997a, Socrates of Constantinople: historian of Church and State, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Urbainczyk, T., 1997b, «Observations on the Differences between the Church Histories of Socrates and Sozomen», ZAG 46.3, 355-373.
Vasiliu, A., 2012, Images de soi dans l' Antiquité Tardive, Paris: Vrin.
Vogt, H. J., 1968, Coetus Sanctorum. Der Kirchenbegriff des Novatian und die Geschichte seiner Sonderkirche, Bonn: Phil. Diss.
Wallraff, M., 1997, Der Kirchenhistoriker Sokrates: Untersuchungen zu Geschichtsdarstellung, Methode und Person, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Zenos, A. C., 1890, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. The Ecclesistical History of Socrates Scholasticus, Edinburgh: Scribners.
Allen, P., 1987, «Some aspects of Hellenism in the early Greek Church Historians», Traditio 43, 368-381. Auksi, P., 1995, Christian Plain Style: the evolution of a spiritual idea, Montreal-London: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Barnes, T. D. and Bevan, G., 2013, The Funerary Speech for John Chrysostom, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Burrus, V., 2000, Begotten not made: conceiving manhood in Late Antiquity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cameron, Av., 1991, Christianity and the Rhetoric of the Empire: the development of Christian discourse, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cameron, Av., 2014, Dialoguing in Late Antiquity, Washington D.C.: Center for Hellenic Studies.
Célérier, P., 2013, L'ombre de l'empereur Julien. Le destin des écrits de Julien chez les auteurs païens et chrétiens du IVe au Vie siècle, Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest.
Cribiore, R., 2013, Libanius the Sophist: rhetoric, reality, and religion in the fourth century, Ithaca: Cornwell University Press.
Dodds, E. R., 1959, Gorgias, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Eshleman, K., 2012, The social world of intellectuals in the Roman Empire: sophists, philosophers, and Christians, Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
Eucken, C., 2001, «Philosophie und Dialektik in der Kirchengeschichte des Sokrates», in: B. Bäbler; H.-G. Nesselrath, and C. Schäublin (eds.), Die Welt des Sokrates von Konstantinopel: Studien zu Politik, Religion und Kultur im späten 4. und frühen 5. Jh. n. Chr., München: K.G. Saur, 96-110.
Fowler, H. N., 1926, Cratylus. Parmenides. Greater Hippias. Lesser Hippias, London: Heinemman. Fredal, J., 1998, Beyond the Fifth Canon: Body Rhetoric in Ancient Greece, PhD.
Gleason, M., 1995, Making Men. Sophist and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Goffman, E. 1971, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Penguin.
Grillet, B., Sabbah, G. and Festugière, A.-J., 1983-2008, Sozomen. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Paris: Du Cerf.
Hägg, T., 2006, «Gregory of Nazianzus: A new Lease of Life for the Second Sophistic», in: S. Eklund (ed.), Sunkharmata: Studies in Honour of Jan Fredrik Kindstrand, Uppsala: Uppsala University, 113-127.
Hartrant, C. D., 1890, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. The Ecclesistical History of Socrates Scholasticus, Buffalo: Christian Literature Publishing.
Hoof, L. van, 2013, «Performing Paideia: Greek Culture as an Instrument for Social promotion in the Fourth Century AD», CQ 63.1, 387-406.
Kennedy, G., 1983, Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lamb, W.R.M., 1925, Lysis. Symposium. Gorgias, London: Heinemann.
Leppin, H., 2003, «The Church Historians (I): Socrates, Sozomenus and Theodoretus», in: G. Marasco (ed.), Greek and Roman Historiography in Late Antiquity: fourth to sixth century AD, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 219-254.
Maxwell, J., 2006, Christianization and Communication in Late Antiquity: John Chrysostom and His Congregation in Antioch, Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
Nesselrath, H.-G., 2006, «Sophisten bei Sokrates von Konstantinopel», in: E.Amato (ed.), Approches de la troisième sophistique: hommages à Jacques Schamp, Brussels: Latomus, 179-192.
Nesselrath, H.-G., 2012, Libanios, Hiersemann: Stuttgart.
Nuffelen, P. van, 2004, Un héritage de paix et de piété: etude sur les histoires ecclésiastiques de Socrate et de Sozomène, Leuven: Peeters.
Nuffelen, P. van, 2012, Orosius and the Rhetoric of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nuffelen, P. van, 2014a, «The End of Open Competition? Religious Disputations in Late Antiquity», in: D. Engels and P. Van Nuffelen (eds.), Religion and Competition in Antiquity, Brussels: Latomus, 149-172.
Nuffelen, P. van, 2014b, « A war of words. Sermons and social status in Constantinople under the Theodosian dynasty», in: L. van Hoof and P. van Nuffelen (eds.), Literature and Society in the Fourth Century AD. Performing paideia, constructing the present, presenting the self, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 201-217.
Périchon, P. and Maraval, P., 2004-2007, Socrates. Histoire Ecclésiastique, Paris: Du Cerf.
Pernot, L., 1993, La rhétorique de l'éloge dans le monde gréco-romain, Paris: Institute d'études augustiniennes.
Pernot, L., 2000, La rhétorique dans l' Antiquité, Paris: Poche.
Spuntarelli, C., 2012, Oratore Divino. Linguaggio e rappresentazione retorica nella controversia tra Cappadoci e Anomei, Roma: Istituto Patristico Augustinianum.
Schamp, J., 2006, «Sophistes à l'ambon, esquisses pour la Troisième Sophistique comme paysage littéraire», in: E. Amato (ed.), Approches de la troisième sophistique: hommages à Jacques Schamp, Brussels: Latomus, 286-338.
Urbainczyk, T., 1997a, Socrates of Constantinople: historian of Church and State, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Urbainczyk, T., 1997b, «Observations on the Differences between the Church Histories of Socrates and Sozomen», ZAG 46.3, 355-373.
Vasiliu, A., 2012, Images de soi dans l' Antiquité Tardive, Paris: Vrin.
Vogt, H. J., 1968, Coetus Sanctorum. Der Kirchenbegriff des Novatian und die Geschichte seiner Sonderkirche, Bonn: Phil. Diss.
Wallraff, M., 1997, Der Kirchenhistoriker Sokrates: Untersuchungen zu Geschichtsdarstellung, Methode und Person, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Zenos, A. C., 1890, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. The Ecclesistical History of Socrates Scholasticus, Edinburgh: Scribners.
Sección
Dossier monográfico: Retórica e Historiografía grecolatinas
A no ser que se indique lo contrario, los contenidos de la edición electrónica de la plataforma OJS se regulan por una licencia de uso y distribución Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-ND).
La revista no cobra ninguna compensación económica a los autores por publicar en ella y da total acceso a los archivos sin ningún tipo de embargo desde el día de su publicación electrónica. Se respeta así la política nacional de acceso abierto.
Todos los originales publicados en la revista Veleia, ya sea en su formato impreso o en el digital, son propiedad de la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU). © UPV/EHU
Los autores de artículos (sean artículos de investigación, noticias, varia o reseñas) podrán acceder a sus propias obras en la página web de la revista. Los autores podrán colocarlos en sus repositorios personales y cuentan también con la posibilidad de difusión pre-print de los artículos ya admitidos para publicar.