Reconstrucción sintáctica e indoeuropeo: estado de la cuestión
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicado
13-12-2016
Thórhallur Eythórsson
Jóhanna Barðdal
Resumen
El interés por la reconstrucción sintáctica estaba presente en la obra de los padres fundadores del Método Comparativo, incluidos Franz Bopp y sus contemporáneos. Los neogramáticos retomaron este interés por las cuestiones sintácticas, y se centraron especialmente en la sintaxis descriptiva comparada. En el siglo xx, la investigación de corte tipológico dio lugar a varias propuestas de reconstrucción de un orden de palabras no marcado. Esta labor encontró la oposición crítica de Watkins (1976), lo cual tuvo la desafortunada consecuencia de que el trabajo en reconstrucción lingüística fue prácticamente abandonado. Sin embargo, los trabajos pioneros de Hale (1987a), Garrett (1990) y Harris & Campbell (1995) mostraron que la reconstrucción sintáctica podía ser abordada de modo satisfactorio. A día de hoy, la reconstrucción sintáctica se lleva a cabo en tres corrientes lingüísticas: (i) la indoeuropeística tradicional, (ii) la lingüística formal-generativa, (iii) la gramática de construcciones. Las propuestas derivadas de las dos primeras escuelas lingüísticas resultan ser incompletas, bien por la falta de una representación formal explícita, bien por la falta de adecuación representacional necesaria para explicar los detalles de las correspondencias entre forma y significado que subyacen a cualquier análisis de reconstrucción lingüística. Por el contrario, la gramática de construcciones tiene a su disposición un formalismo representacional elaborado en el que todos los aspectos gramaticales pueden ser explicitados, de modo que es posible la formulación exacta de las correspondencias entre forma y significado que es necesaria para llevar a cabo una reconstrucción completa. Todo esto se va a ilustrar en este artículo con la reconstrucción de varias relaciones gramaticales del proto-germánico en las que están implicadas una serie de construcciones de estructura argumental y los tests de sujeto que se aplican en la gramática de la proto-lengua.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Andersen, H., 1973, «Abductive and Deductive Change», Language 49, 765-793.
Balles, I., 2008, «Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction and 'Morphology as Paleosyntax': The Case of Some Indo-European Secondary Verbal Formation», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.) Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 161-186.
Barðdal, J., 2013, «Construction-Based Historical-Comparative Reconstruction», in G. Trousdale & Th. Hoffmann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 438-457.
Barðdal, J., 2015, «Syntax and Syntactic Reconstruction», in C. Bowern & B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, London: Routledge, 343-373.
Barðdal, J., & Th. Eythórsson, 2012a, «Reconstructing Syntax: Construction Grammar and the Comparative Method», in H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 257-308.
Barðdal, J., & Th. Eythórsson, 2012b, «Hungering and Lusting for Women and Fleshly Delicacies': Reconstructing Grammatical Relations for Proto-Germanic», Transactions of the Philological Society 110.3, 363-393.
Barðdal, J., & Th. Eythórsson, 2017, «How to Identify Cognates in Syntax? Taking Watkins' Legacy One Step Further», to appear in E. R. Luján, J. Barðdal & S. Gildea (eds.), Reconstructing Syntax, Leiden: Brill.
Barðdal, J. & Th. Smitherman, 2013, «The Quest for Cognates: A Reconstruction of Oblique Subject Constructions in Proto-Indo-European», Language Dynamics and Change 3.1, 28-67.
Barðdal, J., V. Bjarnadóttir, S. Danesi, T. K. Dewey, Th. Eythórsson, Ch. Fedriani & Th. Smitherman, 2013, «The Story of 'Woe'», Journal of Indo-European Studies 41.3-4, 321-377.
Bauer, B. L. M., 2000, Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin and French, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bopp, F., 1816, Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache, Frankfurt a. M.: In der Andreäischen Buchhandlung.
Bowern, C., 2008, «Syntactic Change and Syntactic Reconstruction in Generative Grammar», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 187-216.
Brugmann, K., 1913, «Zu den Ablautverhältnissen der sogenannten starken Verba des Germanischen», Indogermanische Forschungen 32, 179-195.
Campbell, L., 1995, «History of the Study of Historical Syntax», In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & Th. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2. Halbband / Volume 2, 1136-1166.
Chomsky, N., 1986, «Some Observations on Language and Language Learning: Reply to Macnamara, Arbib, and Moore and Furrow», New Ideas in Psychology 4, 363-377.
Chomsky, N., 1993, «A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory», in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1-52.
Delbrück, B., 1878, Die altindische Wortfolge aus dem Çatapathabrāhmana dargestellt (Syntaktische Forschungen III), Halle: Verlag des Waisenhauses.
Delbrück, B., 1893-1900, Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen, Strassburg: Trübner.
Delbrück, B., 1907, Synkretismus. Ein Beitrag zur germanischen Kasuslehre, Strassburg: Trübner.
Eythórsson, Th., 1995, Verbal Syntax in the Early Germanic Languages, Ph. D. Dissertation, Cornell University. Ithaca, NY.
Eythórsson, Th., & J. Barðdal. 2011, «Die Konstruktionsgrammatik und die komparative Methode», in Th. Krisch & Th. Lindner (eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog: Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg, Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 148-156.
Ferraresi, G., 2005, Word Order and Phrase Structure in Gothic, Leuven: Peeters.
Ferraresi, G., & M. Goldbach (eds.), 2008, Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fortson, B. W. IV, 2010, Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Friedrich, P., 1975, Proto-Indo-European syntax: The order of meaningful elements (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph, 1), Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man.
Fritz, M., 2010, «Zur Syntax des Urindogermanischen», in M. Meier-Brügger (ed.), Indogermanisch Sprachwissenschaft, 9th edition, Berlin: De Gruyter, 374-412.
Gamkrelidze, T. V., & V. V. Ivanov 1995, Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A reconstruction and historical analysis of a proto-language and a proto-culture, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garrett, A., 1990, The Syntax of Anatolian Pronominal Clitics, Ph. D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
Cambridge, MA.
Gildea, S., 1992, Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax: On the Genesis of Ergativity in Independent Clauses, University of Oregon, Ph. D. Dissertation.
Gildea, S., 1998, On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gildea, S., 2000, «On the Genesis of the Verb Phrase in Cariban Languages», in S. Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65-106.
Goldbach, M., & G. Ferraresi (eds.), 2008, Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, J. H., 1966, «Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements», in J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language: Reports of a Conference Held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13-15, 1961, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 73-113.
Hale, M., 1987a, Studies in the comparative syntax of the oldest Indo-Iranian languages, Ph. D. Dissertation, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.
Hale, M., 1987b, «Notes on Wackernagel's Law in the language of the Rigveda», in C. Watkins (ed.), Studies in memory of Warren Cowgill (1929-1985): Papers from the Fourth East Coast Indo-European Conference, Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter, 38-50.
Hale, M., 2015, «The Comparative Method: Theoretical Issues», in C. Bowern & B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, London: Routledge, 146-160.
Harris, A. C., 1985, Diachronic Syntax: The Kartvelian Case, New York: Academic Press.
Harris, A. C., 2008, «Reconstruction in Syntax: Reconstruction of Patterns», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.),Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73-95.
Harris, A. C., & L. Campbell 1995, Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Havers, W., 1911, Untersuchungen zur Kasussyntax der idg. Sprachen, Strassburg: Trübner.
Hermann, E., 1895, «Gab es im Indogermanischen Nebensätze?», Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 33.4, 481-534.
Hock, H. H., 1986, Principles of Historical Linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hock, H. H., 2006, «The Insular Celtic Absolute: Conjunct Distinction Once Again: A Prosodic Proposal», in K. Jones-Bley, M. E. Huld, A. Della Volpe & M. Robbins Dexter, Proceedings of the 16th UCLA IndoEuropean Conference. Los Angeles, Nov. 5-6, 2005, Washington: Institute for the Study of Man, 153-172.
Hock, H. H., 2013, «Reconstruction, Typology, Validation», Journal of Historical Linguistics 3.1, 49-76.
Jeffers, R. J., 1976, «Syntactic change and syntactic reconstruction», in W. M. Christie, Jr. (ed.), Current Progress in Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 1-15.
Jolly, J., 1872, Ein Kapitel vergleichender Syntax: Der Conjunktiv und Optativ und die Nebensätze im Zend und Altpersischen, Munich: Ackermann.
Keydana, G., 2013, Infinitive im Rigveda: Formen, Funktion, Diachronie, Leiden: Brill.
Kikusawa, R., 2002, Proto Central Pacific Ergativity: Its Reconstruction and Development in the Fijian, Rotuman and Polynesian languages, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Kikusawa, R., 2003, «The Development of Some Indonesian Pronominal Systems», in B. J. Blake, K. Burridge & J. Taylor (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13-17 August 2001, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 237-268.
Klein, J. S., 1992, On Verbal Accentuation in the Rigveda (= American Oriental Society Essay, 11), New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.
Kulikov, L., & N. Lavidas, 2013a, «Reconstructing Passive and Voice in Proto-Indo-European», Journal of Historical Linguistics 3.1, 101-124.
Kulikov, L., & N. Lavidas (eds.) 2013b, «Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development», a guest-edited issue of Journal of Historical Linguistics 3.1, 1-152.
Lehmann, W. P., 1974, Proto-Indo-European Syntax, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lightfoot, D. W., 1979, Principles of Diachronic Syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, D. W., 2002a, «Myths and the Prehistory of Grammars», Journal of Linguistics 38.1, 113-136.
Lightfoot, D. W., 2002b, «More Myths», Journal of Linguistics 38.3, 619-626.
Lühr, R., 2008, «Competitive Indo-European Syntax», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach, Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121-159.
Luján, E. R., J. Barðdal & S. Gildea (eds.), 2017, Reconstructing Syntax, Leiden: Brill.
Luján, E. R., & Á. López Chala 2017, «Reconstructing Semantic Roles: Proto-Indo-European *-bhi as a Case Study», to appear in E. R. Luján, J. Barðdal & S. Gildea (eds.), Reconstructing Syntax, Brill: Leiden.
Luraghi, S., 2017, «External Possessor Constructions in Indo-European», to appear in E. R. Luján, J. Barðdal & S. Gildea (eds.), Reconstructing Syntax, Brill: Leiden.
Mendoza, J., 1998, Sintaxis. Manual de Lingüística Indoeuropea III, en F. R. Adrados, A. Bernabé & J. Mendoza, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 141-246.
Mengden, F. von. 2008, «Reconstructing Complex Structures: A Typological Perspective», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 97-119.
Miller, D. G., 1975, «Indo-European: VSO, SOV, SVO, or all three?», Lingua 37, 31-52.
Pedersen, H., 1907, Neues und nachträgliches Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 40, 129-217.
Pires, A., & S. G. Thomason 2008, «How Much Syntactic Reconstruction is Possible?», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27-72.
Rask, R. K., 1818, Undersøgelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse, Copenhagen: Den Gyldendalske Boghandlings Forlag.
Rizza, A., & P., Cotticelli Kurras 2013, «Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European Categories: The Reflexive and the Middle in Hittite and the Proto-Language», Journal of Historical Linguistics 3.1, 7-27.
Rizzi, L., 1997, «The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery», in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281-337.
Thurneysen, R., 1885, «Der indogermanische Imperativ», Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 27.2, 172-180.
Thurneysen, R., 1892, «Zur Stellung des Verbums in Altfranzösischen», Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 16, 289-307.
Uhlenbeck, Ch. C., 1901, «Agens und Patiens im Kasussystem der indogermanischen Sprachen», Indogermanische Forschungen 12, 170-171.
Vaillant, A., 1936, «L'ergatif indo-européen», Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 37, 93-108.
Viti, C., 2014, «Reconstructing Syntactic Variation in Proto-Indo-European», Indo-European Linguistics 2, 73-111.
Viti, C., 2015, Variation und Wandel in der Syntax der alten indogermanischen Sprachen, Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
Wackernagel, J., 1926, Vorlesungen über Syntax: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch, Erste Reihe, Basel: Birkhäuser.
Walkden, G., 2009, The Comparative Method in Syntactic Reconstruction, Cambridge University M. Phil. Dissertation.
Walkden, G., 2014, Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watkins, C., 1976, «Towards Proto-Indo-European Syntax: Problems and Pseudo-problems», in S. B. Steever, C. A. Walker & S. S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 306-326.
Watkins, C., 1995, How to Kill a Dragon in Indo-European: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weiss, M., 2009, Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin, Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.
Willis, D., 2011, «Reconstructing Last Week's Weather: Syntactic Reconstruction and Brythonic Free Relatives», Journal of Linguistics 47.2, 407-446.
Winter, W., 1984, «Reconstructional Comparative Linguistics and the Reconstruction of the Syntax of Undocumented Stages in the Development of Languages and Language Families», in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Syntax, The Hague: Mouton, 613-625.
Balles, I., 2008, «Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction and 'Morphology as Paleosyntax': The Case of Some Indo-European Secondary Verbal Formation», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.) Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 161-186.
Barðdal, J., 2013, «Construction-Based Historical-Comparative Reconstruction», in G. Trousdale & Th. Hoffmann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 438-457.
Barðdal, J., 2015, «Syntax and Syntactic Reconstruction», in C. Bowern & B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, London: Routledge, 343-373.
Barðdal, J., & Th. Eythórsson, 2012a, «Reconstructing Syntax: Construction Grammar and the Comparative Method», in H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 257-308.
Barðdal, J., & Th. Eythórsson, 2012b, «Hungering and Lusting for Women and Fleshly Delicacies': Reconstructing Grammatical Relations for Proto-Germanic», Transactions of the Philological Society 110.3, 363-393.
Barðdal, J., & Th. Eythórsson, 2017, «How to Identify Cognates in Syntax? Taking Watkins' Legacy One Step Further», to appear in E. R. Luján, J. Barðdal & S. Gildea (eds.), Reconstructing Syntax, Leiden: Brill.
Barðdal, J. & Th. Smitherman, 2013, «The Quest for Cognates: A Reconstruction of Oblique Subject Constructions in Proto-Indo-European», Language Dynamics and Change 3.1, 28-67.
Barðdal, J., V. Bjarnadóttir, S. Danesi, T. K. Dewey, Th. Eythórsson, Ch. Fedriani & Th. Smitherman, 2013, «The Story of 'Woe'», Journal of Indo-European Studies 41.3-4, 321-377.
Bauer, B. L. M., 2000, Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin and French, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bopp, F., 1816, Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache, Frankfurt a. M.: In der Andreäischen Buchhandlung.
Bowern, C., 2008, «Syntactic Change and Syntactic Reconstruction in Generative Grammar», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 187-216.
Brugmann, K., 1913, «Zu den Ablautverhältnissen der sogenannten starken Verba des Germanischen», Indogermanische Forschungen 32, 179-195.
Campbell, L., 1995, «History of the Study of Historical Syntax», In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & Th. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2. Halbband / Volume 2, 1136-1166.
Chomsky, N., 1986, «Some Observations on Language and Language Learning: Reply to Macnamara, Arbib, and Moore and Furrow», New Ideas in Psychology 4, 363-377.
Chomsky, N., 1993, «A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory», in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1-52.
Delbrück, B., 1878, Die altindische Wortfolge aus dem Çatapathabrāhmana dargestellt (Syntaktische Forschungen III), Halle: Verlag des Waisenhauses.
Delbrück, B., 1893-1900, Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen, Strassburg: Trübner.
Delbrück, B., 1907, Synkretismus. Ein Beitrag zur germanischen Kasuslehre, Strassburg: Trübner.
Eythórsson, Th., 1995, Verbal Syntax in the Early Germanic Languages, Ph. D. Dissertation, Cornell University. Ithaca, NY.
Eythórsson, Th., & J. Barðdal. 2011, «Die Konstruktionsgrammatik und die komparative Methode», in Th. Krisch & Th. Lindner (eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog: Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg, Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 148-156.
Ferraresi, G., 2005, Word Order and Phrase Structure in Gothic, Leuven: Peeters.
Ferraresi, G., & M. Goldbach (eds.), 2008, Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fortson, B. W. IV, 2010, Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Friedrich, P., 1975, Proto-Indo-European syntax: The order of meaningful elements (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph, 1), Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man.
Fritz, M., 2010, «Zur Syntax des Urindogermanischen», in M. Meier-Brügger (ed.), Indogermanisch Sprachwissenschaft, 9th edition, Berlin: De Gruyter, 374-412.
Gamkrelidze, T. V., & V. V. Ivanov 1995, Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A reconstruction and historical analysis of a proto-language and a proto-culture, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Garrett, A., 1990, The Syntax of Anatolian Pronominal Clitics, Ph. D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
Cambridge, MA.
Gildea, S., 1992, Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax: On the Genesis of Ergativity in Independent Clauses, University of Oregon, Ph. D. Dissertation.
Gildea, S., 1998, On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gildea, S., 2000, «On the Genesis of the Verb Phrase in Cariban Languages», in S. Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65-106.
Goldbach, M., & G. Ferraresi (eds.), 2008, Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, J. H., 1966, «Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements», in J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language: Reports of a Conference Held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13-15, 1961, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 73-113.
Hale, M., 1987a, Studies in the comparative syntax of the oldest Indo-Iranian languages, Ph. D. Dissertation, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.
Hale, M., 1987b, «Notes on Wackernagel's Law in the language of the Rigveda», in C. Watkins (ed.), Studies in memory of Warren Cowgill (1929-1985): Papers from the Fourth East Coast Indo-European Conference, Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter, 38-50.
Hale, M., 2015, «The Comparative Method: Theoretical Issues», in C. Bowern & B. Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, London: Routledge, 146-160.
Harris, A. C., 1985, Diachronic Syntax: The Kartvelian Case, New York: Academic Press.
Harris, A. C., 2008, «Reconstruction in Syntax: Reconstruction of Patterns», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.),Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73-95.
Harris, A. C., & L. Campbell 1995, Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Havers, W., 1911, Untersuchungen zur Kasussyntax der idg. Sprachen, Strassburg: Trübner.
Hermann, E., 1895, «Gab es im Indogermanischen Nebensätze?», Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 33.4, 481-534.
Hock, H. H., 1986, Principles of Historical Linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hock, H. H., 2006, «The Insular Celtic Absolute: Conjunct Distinction Once Again: A Prosodic Proposal», in K. Jones-Bley, M. E. Huld, A. Della Volpe & M. Robbins Dexter, Proceedings of the 16th UCLA IndoEuropean Conference. Los Angeles, Nov. 5-6, 2005, Washington: Institute for the Study of Man, 153-172.
Hock, H. H., 2013, «Reconstruction, Typology, Validation», Journal of Historical Linguistics 3.1, 49-76.
Jeffers, R. J., 1976, «Syntactic change and syntactic reconstruction», in W. M. Christie, Jr. (ed.), Current Progress in Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 1-15.
Jolly, J., 1872, Ein Kapitel vergleichender Syntax: Der Conjunktiv und Optativ und die Nebensätze im Zend und Altpersischen, Munich: Ackermann.
Keydana, G., 2013, Infinitive im Rigveda: Formen, Funktion, Diachronie, Leiden: Brill.
Kikusawa, R., 2002, Proto Central Pacific Ergativity: Its Reconstruction and Development in the Fijian, Rotuman and Polynesian languages, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Kikusawa, R., 2003, «The Development of Some Indonesian Pronominal Systems», in B. J. Blake, K. Burridge & J. Taylor (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13-17 August 2001, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 237-268.
Klein, J. S., 1992, On Verbal Accentuation in the Rigveda (= American Oriental Society Essay, 11), New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.
Kulikov, L., & N. Lavidas, 2013a, «Reconstructing Passive and Voice in Proto-Indo-European», Journal of Historical Linguistics 3.1, 101-124.
Kulikov, L., & N. Lavidas (eds.) 2013b, «Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development», a guest-edited issue of Journal of Historical Linguistics 3.1, 1-152.
Lehmann, W. P., 1974, Proto-Indo-European Syntax, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lightfoot, D. W., 1979, Principles of Diachronic Syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, D. W., 2002a, «Myths and the Prehistory of Grammars», Journal of Linguistics 38.1, 113-136.
Lightfoot, D. W., 2002b, «More Myths», Journal of Linguistics 38.3, 619-626.
Lühr, R., 2008, «Competitive Indo-European Syntax», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach, Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121-159.
Luján, E. R., J. Barðdal & S. Gildea (eds.), 2017, Reconstructing Syntax, Leiden: Brill.
Luján, E. R., & Á. López Chala 2017, «Reconstructing Semantic Roles: Proto-Indo-European *-bhi as a Case Study», to appear in E. R. Luján, J. Barðdal & S. Gildea (eds.), Reconstructing Syntax, Brill: Leiden.
Luraghi, S., 2017, «External Possessor Constructions in Indo-European», to appear in E. R. Luján, J. Barðdal & S. Gildea (eds.), Reconstructing Syntax, Brill: Leiden.
Mendoza, J., 1998, Sintaxis. Manual de Lingüística Indoeuropea III, en F. R. Adrados, A. Bernabé & J. Mendoza, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 141-246.
Mengden, F. von. 2008, «Reconstructing Complex Structures: A Typological Perspective», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 97-119.
Miller, D. G., 1975, «Indo-European: VSO, SOV, SVO, or all three?», Lingua 37, 31-52.
Pedersen, H., 1907, Neues und nachträgliches Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 40, 129-217.
Pires, A., & S. G. Thomason 2008, «How Much Syntactic Reconstruction is Possible?», in G. Ferraresi & M. Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27-72.
Rask, R. K., 1818, Undersøgelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse, Copenhagen: Den Gyldendalske Boghandlings Forlag.
Rizza, A., & P., Cotticelli Kurras 2013, «Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European Categories: The Reflexive and the Middle in Hittite and the Proto-Language», Journal of Historical Linguistics 3.1, 7-27.
Rizzi, L., 1997, «The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery», in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281-337.
Thurneysen, R., 1885, «Der indogermanische Imperativ», Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 27.2, 172-180.
Thurneysen, R., 1892, «Zur Stellung des Verbums in Altfranzösischen», Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 16, 289-307.
Uhlenbeck, Ch. C., 1901, «Agens und Patiens im Kasussystem der indogermanischen Sprachen», Indogermanische Forschungen 12, 170-171.
Vaillant, A., 1936, «L'ergatif indo-européen», Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 37, 93-108.
Viti, C., 2014, «Reconstructing Syntactic Variation in Proto-Indo-European», Indo-European Linguistics 2, 73-111.
Viti, C., 2015, Variation und Wandel in der Syntax der alten indogermanischen Sprachen, Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
Wackernagel, J., 1926, Vorlesungen über Syntax: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch, Erste Reihe, Basel: Birkhäuser.
Walkden, G., 2009, The Comparative Method in Syntactic Reconstruction, Cambridge University M. Phil. Dissertation.
Walkden, G., 2014, Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watkins, C., 1976, «Towards Proto-Indo-European Syntax: Problems and Pseudo-problems», in S. B. Steever, C. A. Walker & S. S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 306-326.
Watkins, C., 1995, How to Kill a Dragon in Indo-European: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weiss, M., 2009, Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin, Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.
Willis, D., 2011, «Reconstructing Last Week's Weather: Syntactic Reconstruction and Brythonic Free Relatives», Journal of Linguistics 47.2, 407-446.
Winter, W., 1984, «Reconstructional Comparative Linguistics and the Reconstruction of the Syntax of Undocumented Stages in the Development of Languages and Language Families», in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Syntax, The Hague: Mouton, 613-625.
Sección
Dossier monográfico: Franz Bopp and his Comparative Grammar model (1816-2016)
A no ser que se indique lo contrario, los contenidos de la edición electrónica de la plataforma OJS se regulan por una licencia de uso y distribución Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-ND).
La revista no cobra ninguna compensación económica a los autores por publicar en ella y da total acceso a los archivos sin ningún tipo de embargo desde el día de su publicación electrónica. Se respeta así la política nacional de acceso abierto.
Todos los originales publicados en la revista Veleia, ya sea en su formato impreso o en el digital, son propiedad de la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU). © UPV/EHU
Los autores de artículos (sean artículos de investigación, noticias, varia o reseñas) podrán acceder a sus propias obras en la página web de la revista. Los autores podrán colocarlos en sus repositorios personales y cuentan también con la posibilidad de difusión pre-print de los artículos ya admitidos para publicar.