Franz Bopp, "mit Haar und Haut ein Mensch der Bücher": searching for the origin of Indo-European grammatical forms

Abstract

@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }@font-face { font-family: "AGaramondPro-Regular"; }@font-face { font-family: "AGaramondPro-Italic"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }p.Autorprimerapagina, li.Autorprimerapagina, div.Autorprimerapagina { margin: 14.15pt 0cm 34pt; text-align: center; line-height: 12.8pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: AGaramondPro-Regular; color: black; }div.Section1 { }

Franz Bopp (1791-1867), who is commonly considered one of the founding fathers of Indo-European comparative grammar, was primarily interested in the origin of grammatical forms, a goal he pursued, from 1816 on, through the analytical comparison of formative processes of inflectional word classes in Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, German, and Persian in a first stage (other Indo-European languages were progressively included in his scholarly spectrum). The larger part of Bopp's work was in the field of Sanskrit, but his interest in the grammatical processes active in the unitary mother language (Stammsprache) led him to write the first comparative grammar of Indo-European (published in three volumes over the years 1833-1852); this comprehensive work (of which a second edition appeared in 1857-61, and a third in 1868-71) was preceded and followed by various monograph-sized studies in which Bopp applied an analytical procedure to the segmentation, the classification and the explanation of Indo-European grammatical forms. Combining a chronological overview of Bopp's scholarly career with a study of his comparative methodology, the present article examines the assumptions or hypotheses underlying Bopp's work, and the resulting claims (regarding the structure of Indo-European roots, the constitution of grammatical forms, and the content-side of grammatical morphemes), with an eye at Bopp's intellectual and institutional position as well as at his appraisal by contemporaries and by subsequent generations of scholars.