Linguistic politeness axes in Euripides

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 21-02-2022
Sandra Rodriguez Piedrabuena

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the distribution of deference and insults with regard to three linguistic politeness axes: Speaker-addressee, speaker-referent, speaker-bystander. In the following example, Theseus insults the Herald in the speaker-bystander axis, since he abusively speaks of him to a third participant:

E.Supp.426-28: κομψός γ’ ὁ κῆρυξ καὶ παρεργάτης λόγων.

The herald is a real smart-alec and over-argumentative.

The scale, on the one hand, of insulting and, on the other, of deference, works inversely. Therefore, a semi-circular continuum of pragmatic in-/sincerity is advanced. The S-addressee axis is the most unstable zone, both for the expression of deference and insults because it leaves way to over- and under-politeness, respectively. The S-bystander axis is more effective both for the expression of deference and for conveying insults.

Abstract 232 | PDF (Español) Downloads 444

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Allan, W., 2001, Euripides: The Children of Heracles, Oxford: Aris & Phillips.

Barrett, W. S., 1964, Euripides: Hippolytus, Oxford: OUP.

Barrios-Lech, P., 2016, Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy, Cambridge: CUP.

Berger, Ł., 2017, «Estrategias de la cortesía positiva en la apertura diálogica en Plauto y Terencio», Revista de Estudios Latinos 17, 11-35.

Biehl, W., 1965, Euripides: Orestes, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Bond, G. W., 1981, Euripides: Heracles, Oxford: OUP.

Bremmer, N. J., 2000, «Verbal insulting in Ancient Greek culture», Acta Antiqua, 40.1-4, 61-72.

Brown, P., & S. C. Levinson, 1987 [1978], Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use, Cambridge: CUP.

Cayless, H. A., 1999, The rhetoric of praise in poetry from Theocritus to Ovid, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (tesis doctoral).

Collard, C., 1975, Euripides: Supplices (2 vols.), Groningen: Bouma.

Collard, C., 1991, Euripides: Hecuba, Warminster: Aris & Phillips.

Collard, C., 2005, «Colloquial language in tragedy: A supplement to the work of P.T. Stevens», Classical Quarterly 55(2), 350-386.

Comrie, B., 1976, «Linguistic politeness axes: speaker-addressee, speaker-referent, speaker-bystander», Pragmatics Microfiche 1(7), 1-12.

Dale, A., 1967, Euripides: Helen, Oxford: OUP.

Denniston, J., 1939, Euripides: Electra, Oxford: OUP.

Dickey, E., 1996, Greek Forms of Address: From Herodotus to Lucian, Oxford: OUP.

Escandell Vidal, M. V., 1993, Introducción a la pragmática, Barcelona: Anthropos.

Fraenkel, E., 1950, Aeschylus: Agamemnon (3 vols.), Oxford: OUP.

Gregory, J., 1999, Euripides: Hecuba, Oxford: OUP.

House, J., & G. Kasper, 1981, «Politeness markers in English and German», en F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, La Haya, Paris, New York: Mouton, 157-185.

Jebb, R. C., 1885, Sophocles: The Oedipus Coloneus, Cambridge: CUP.

Johansen, H. F., & E. Whittle, 1980, Aeschylus: The suppliants (3 vols.), København: Nordisk Forlag.

Kamen, D., 2020, Insults in Classical Athens, University of Wisconsin Press.

Kopperschmidt, J., 1966, Die Hikesie als dramatische Form, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (tesis doctoral).

Lloyd, M., 1994, Euripides: Andromache, Warminster: Aris & Phillips.

López Eire, J. A., 2004, «Sobre la léxis de la tragedia griega antigua», en J. A. López Férez (ed.), La tragedia griega en sus textos, Madrid: Ediciones clásicas, 1-45.

Matthiessen, K., 2010, Euripides: Hekabe, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

Morwood, J., 2007, Euripides: Suppliant women, Oxford: Aris & Phillips.

Murray, G., 1902, Euripidis fabulae (vol. I), Oxford: OUP.

Murray, G. & T. Nicklin, 1936, The suppliant women of Euripides, Oxford: OUP.

Naiden, F., 2006, Ancient supplication, Oxford, Nueva York: OUP.

Nevala, M., 2004, «Accessing politeness axes: forms of address and terms of reference in early English correspondence», Journal of Pragmatics 36, 2125-2160.

Pearson, A. C., 1907, Euripides: The Heraclidae, Cambridge: CUP.

Pernot, L., 2015, Epideictic rhetoric: questioning the stakes of ancient praise, Austin (Tex.): University of Texas.

Pomerantz, A., & J. Heritage, 2013, «Preference», en J. Sidnell, T. Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 210-229.

Porter, J. R., 1994, Studies in Euripides’ Orestes, Leiden, New York, Köln: Brill.

Rodríguez Piedrabuena, S., 2019, La lengua de los personajes. Caracterización lingüística en la obra de Eurípides a partir de los Heraclidas, Universidad de Sevilla (tesis doctoral).

Rodríguez Piedrabuena, S., 2020a, «(Im)politeness Strategies in Euripides: An Approach to Linguistic Characterisation through Qualitative Data Analysis», Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 139, 271-297.

Rodríguez Piedrabuena, S., 2020b, «Overpoliteness in Euripides», Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae 30(1), 73-96.

Stevens, P. T., 1971, Euripides: Andromache, Oxford: OUP.

Stevens, P. T., 1976, Colloquial expressions in Euripides, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.

Venegas Lagüéns, M., 1991, Elizabeth C. Gaskell: characterization through language, Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla, Secretariado de Publicaciones.

Wilkins, J., 1995 (19931), Euripides: Heraclidae, Oxford: OUP.

Will, F., 1961, «Tyndareus in the Orestes», Symbolae Osloenses 37, 96-99.

Willi, A., 2003, The languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of linguistic variation in Classical Attic Greek, Oxford: OUP.

Willink, C., 1986, Euripides: Orestes, Oxford: OUP.

West, M. L., 1987, Euripides: Orestes, Warminster: Aris & Phillips.

Yoon, F., 2012, The use of anonymous characters in Greek tragedy, Leiden, Amsterdam: Brill.
Section
"New Insights into Politeness and Impoliteness"