Archaeological Evidence for the Falseness of the Inscription IHC 65. The Necessary Simbiosis between Epigraphy and Archaeology to Understand Late Antiquity in Baetica
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
For years we have been advocating the need to review the large amount of spolia that formed Antiquity architecture in Baetica. From the beginning, Epigraphy, in relation to which we have articulated a new method of analysis, has played an important role in this process. At the same time, this new way to study the inscriptions which lack an archaeological context also allows us to approach Epigraphy starting with archaeological methodologies, which have provided important new findings, including the confirmation of the fake nature and / or erroneous chronological attribution of various inscriptions, including the inscription IHC 65.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Unless otherwise noted, the contents of the electronic edition of the OJS platform are licensed for use and distribution under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND) license.
The journal does not charge any financial compensation to authors for publishing in it and provides full access to the archives without any kind of embargo from the day of electronic publication. This respects the national open access policy.
All originals published in the journal Veleia, whether in print or digital format, are the property of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU). © UPV/EHU
Authors of articles (whether research articles, news articles, news items or reviews) will be able to access their own work on the Journal's website. Authors will be able to put them in their personal repositories and will also have the possibility of pre-print dissemination of articles accepted for publication.