References
ACS, Z. y AUDRETSCH, D. (1989): “Patent as a measure of innovative activity”, Kyklos, Vol. 42, Nº 2, pp. 171-180.
ACS, Z.; ANSELIN, L. y VARGA, A. (2002): “Patent and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 1069-1085.
ARCHIBUGI, D. y PIANTA, M. (1996): “Innovation surveys and patents as technology indicators: the state of the art”, en OCDE (ed.), Innovation, patents and technological strategies, pp. 17-56.
AZAGRA, J. (2004): La contribución de las universidades a la innovación: efectos del fomento de la interacción universidad-empresa y las patentes universitarias, Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Valencia.
AZAGRA-CARO J.; CARAYOL, N. y LLERENA, P. (2006): “Patent production at a European research university: exploratory evidence at the laboratory level”, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 31, Nº 3, pp. 257-268.
AZAGRA-CARO, J.; ARCHONTAKIS, F; GUTIERREZ-GARCÍA, A. y FERNANDEZ-DE-LUCIO, I. (2006): “Faculty support for the objectives of university-industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity”, Research Policy, Vol. 35, pp. 37-55.
BALDINI, N. (2006): “University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 15, Nº 3, pp. 197-207.
BALDINI, N. (2009): “Implementing Bayh-Dole-like laws: faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activity”, Research Policy, Vol. 38, pp. 1217-1224.
BALDINI, N. (2010): “Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy”, Technovation, Vol. 30, pp. 109-116
BONACCORSI, A. y THOMA, G. (2007): “Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology”, Research Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 813-831.
BAS, C. L. y SIERRA, C. (2002): “Location versus home country advantages in R&D activities: some results on multinationals locational strategies”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 589-609.
BASBERG, L. (1983): “Foreign patenting in the US as a technology indicator: the case of Norway”, Research Policy, Vol. 12, pp. 227-237.
BASBERG, L. (1987): “Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature”, Research Policy, Vol. 16, pp. 131-141.
BRICALL, J. M. (2000): Informe Universidad 2000, Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas (CRUE). http://www.suc.unam.mx/bricall, consultado en abril de 2005.
BULUT, H. y MOSCHINI, G. (2009): “US universities´net returns from patenting and licensing: a quantile regression analysis”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 18, Nº 2, pp. 123-137.
COLLINS, S. y WAKOH, H. (2000): “Universities and technology transfer in Japan: recent reforms in historical perspective”, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 2, pp. 213-222.
DESROCHERS, P. (1998): “On the abuse of patents as economic indicators”, The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 1, Nº 4, pp. 51-74.
ETZKOWITZ, H. y LEYDESDORFF, L. (1996): “Emergence of a triple helix of university–industry–government relations”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 279–286.
ETZKOWITZ, H. y LEYDESDORFF, L. (1997): Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Cassell Academic, London.
ETZKOWITZ, H. y LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 109–123.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; WEBSTER, A.; GEBHARDT, C. y CANTISANO, B. R. (2000): “The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 313–330.
ETZKOWITZ, H. y DZISAH, J. (2008): “Rethinking development: circulation in the triple helix, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 20, Nº 6, pp. 653-666.
FREEMAN, C. (1987): Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
FUJISUE, K. (1998): “Promotion of academia-industry cooperation in Japan: establishing the law of promoting technology transfer from university to industry in Japan”, Technovation, Vol. 18, Nº 6/7, pp. 371-381.
GODIN, B. y GINGRAS, Y. (2000): “The place of universities in the system of knowledge production”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 273-278.
GIBBONS, M.; LIMOGES, C.; NOWOTNY, H.; SCHWARTZMAN, S.; SCOOT, P. y TROW, M., (1994): The new production of knowledge, Sage Publications.
GRILICHES, Z. (1990): “Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, December, pp. 1661-1707.
GRUPP, H. y SCHMOCH, U., (1999): “Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, Nº 3/4, pp. 225-245.
HICKS, D. (1993): “University-industry research links in Japan”, Policy Sciences, Nº 26, pp. 361-395.
HOWELLS, J. y MCKINLAY, C. (1999): Commercialization of university research in Europe, Report to the Advisory Council on Science and Technology, Ontario, Canada.
LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000): “The triple helix: An evolutionary model of innovations”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 243–255.
LEYDESDORFF, L. y SUN, Y. (2009): “National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, Vol. 60, Nº 4, pp. 778-788.
LUNDVALL, B. A. (1988): “Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation”, en Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. y Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory, Pinter London, pp. 349-269.
MAGAZINER, I.C. y REICH, R.B. (1982): Minding America´s business: The decline and the rise of the American economy, Vintage Books, New York.
MANCUSI, M. L. (2000): “International technological specialisation in industrial countries: patterns and dynamics” Working Paper CERPRI, Nº 118, pp. 1-46, Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation.
MANCUSI, M. L. (2001): “Geographical concentration and the dynamics of countries´ specialization in technologies”, Working Paper CERPRI, Nº 125, pp. 1-31, Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation.
MEYER, M. (2006): “Are patenting scintifics the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology”, Research Policy, Vol. 35, pp. 1646-1662.
MOWERY, D.; NELSON, E.; SAMPAT, B. y ZIEDONIS, A. (2001): “The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities”, Research Policy, Vol. 30, pp. 99–119.
OCDE (1994): The measurement of scientific and technological activities using patent data as science and technology indicators: patent manual, OCDE, París.
OST (Observatoire Des Sciences et des Techniques) (1998): Science et technologie: indicateurs, Economica, Paris.
OWEN-SMITH, J.; RICCABONI, M.; PAMMOLLI, F. y POWELL, W. (2002): “A comparison of US and European university-industry relations in the life sciences”, Management Science, Vol. 48, Nº 1, pp. 24-43.
PATEL, P. y PAVITT, K. (1991): “Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: an important case of non globalisation”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 22, Nº 1, pp. 1-21.
PAVITT, K. (1985): “Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems”, Scientometrics, Vol. 7, Nº 1-2, pp. 77-99.
PAVITT, K. (1997): “Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities?”, Science Policy Research Unit, Electronic Working Paper Series, paper Nº 6.
PÉREZ, F. (2004): “Las universidades en la sociedad del conocimiento: la financiación de la enseñanza superior y la investigación”, en Información Académica, productiva y financiera de las Universidades Españolas: Indicadores universitarios (año 2004), Observatorio Universitario de la CRUE, pp. 43-61.
PETERSON, J. y SHARP, M. (1998): Technology policy in the European Union, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
RAHM, D.; KIRKLAND, J. y BOZEMAN, B. (2000): University-industry R&D collaboration in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
ROSELL, C. y AGRAWAL A. (2009): “Have university knowledge flows narrowed? Evidence from patent data”, Research Policy, Vol. 38, pp. 1-13.
SAAD, M. y ZAWDIE, G. (2008): “Triple helix in developing countries – issues and challenges”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 20, Nº 6, pp. 649-652.
SANDELIN, J. (2005): “Japan’s industry-academic-government collaboration and technology transfer practices: a comparison with United States practices”, Journal of Industry-Academia-Government, Vol. 1, Nº 3, pp. 1-4.
SAMPAT, B.N. (2006): “Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: the world before and after Bayh-Dole”, Research Policy, Vol. 35, pp. 772-789.
SPENCER, J.W. (2001): “How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States-Japan comparison”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, Nº 2, pp. 432-440.
TASEY, G. (1998): “Comparisons of US and japanase R&D policies”, Japan Information Access Project, Special Reports. http://www.nmjc.org/jiap/specrpts/reports/sp3_1998.html March 1998.
TAMADA, S.; NAITO, Y.; KOMADA, F.; GEMBA, K. y SUZUKI, J. (2006): “Significant difference of dependence upon scientific knowledge among different technologies”, Scientometrics, Vol. 68, Nº 2, pp. 289-302.
THURSBY, J.; FULLER, A. W. y THURSBY M. (2009): “US faculty patenting: inside and outside the university”, Research Policy, Vol. 38, pp. 14-25.
YAMAMOTO, S. (1997): “The Role of the Japanese higher education system in relation to industry”, en A. Goto y H. Odagiri (Eds.), Innovation in Japan, Oxford University Press, England, pp. 294-307.
