Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
- Two files have been prepared, as specified in the author's guidelines: IDENTIFICATION DATA OF AUTHORS AND WORK SENT BY AUTHOR.
-
It's between 6,000 and 7,500 words.
-
References and bibliography (APA 7) have been correctly provided, as specified in the authors' guidelines.
-
The work fits the lines of the magazine and focuses on education.
Author Guidelines
GUIDELINES FOR THE ARTICLES
1. The works will be original and unpublished elsewhere.
At the time of publication, priority will be given to work with in-depth analysis.
-
- Comparison of means, correlations, factorizations, regressions, etc.
- Description of categorization and coding processes, etc.
2. Priority shall be given to the work of authors not published in the previous edition.
3. In works in which more than four authors appear, the contribution of each author must be justified.
4. The article proposal will be sent to the editorial through the magazine platform.
5. Two files will be sent that can be edited (Word files, ODTs or the like):
5.1. The first file: Egileak identifikatzeko datuak DOCX
5.2. The second file: Autoreak bidalitako lana DOCX and shall meet the following characteristics:
-
- The work should be between 6,000 and 7,500 words, including references (including approximately 25-50 references) and except tables and figures.
- The articles shall comply with the rules laid down in the staff.
- It will be sent without the name of the artisans.
- Titles, summaries and keywords must be recorded in the following languages: Basque, Spanish, English and French.
- The summary will contain 150-200 words.
- The summary shall be accompanied by five or six keywords.
- One of the key words must express the level of education (primary, secondary, university, etc.).
6. For references and mentions, the author will take as a model the APA 7 (American Psychological Association).
7. Bibliographic references, ordered alphabetically, will appear at the end of the text.
GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS
The reviews shall contain the contents, essential ideas and most relevant aspects of the books or monographs published in the field of education, as well as the personal and justified critical assessment made by the author of the review. The readers for whom the book is intended, the main ideas of the book, the solidity of the methods and sources used, the author's research and training trajectory, what can be useful to readers from the book, the context and location of the book in the field, the contribution and implications of the book, the differences with other books on the subject, the strengths and weaknesses of the book...
The reviews will be sent to the editor through the magazine platform (word file, ODT... in one) http://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Tantak
The chapter shall contain the following information:
- Name and surname of the author or authors of the book (and of the publisher, if any), (year of publication).
- Title of the book, place of publication, publisher, number of pages, ISBN number. If there's an electronic version, please indicate it.
The review should take into account:
- The reviews can range from about 750 words to about 1500 words.
- This review shall be drafted in accordance with the rules of the articles in this journal.
- At the end of the review, the name, surname, filiation and e-mail address of the review author shall be provided.
- The approval of the reviews shall be the responsibility of the Drafting Committee, and all texts shall have a language hairstyle. This will be the responsibility of the language technician in the journal.
ACCEPTANCE OR DENIAL OF ARTICLES
The approval of the articles is the responsibility of the Editorial Committee of Tantak Magazine. First, the Drafting Committee shall examine compliance with the basic conditions and then appoint two external evaluators to judge the article blindly.
The Drafting Committee is responsible for publishing and/or rejecting the work, taking into account the evaluation reports of the work. However, the Drafting Committee may reject the work directly without initiating the expert evaluation process if it considers it inappropriate, either because of its low quality, or because it does not conform to the nature of the journal, or because of evidence of fraud, etc.
All articles to be published shall have a language hairstyle, which shall be the responsibility of the language technician of the journal.
DOUBLE-BLIND PEER REVIEW
The authors automatically receive through the Open Journal System (OJS) platform that the magazine has received its work.
Upon receipt and examination of the article by the publishing group, the authors are informed:
(1) Changes in format prior to the submission of the work to evaluators, provided that they are superficial.
2) if it does not conform to the thematic line of the journal or the necessary adaptations are considered important, it will not be published.
If the work is to be evaluated, the editorial team sends the evaluation protocol and evaluation work to the evaluators through the journal's management platform and is evaluated in double-blind peer review form. In other words, the summary, the body of the article and the evaluation criteria are sent to the evaluators, eliminating the identity of the authors and any other data relating thereto. Throughout the process, the anonymity of authors and evaluators is guaranteed.
When there is a discrepancy between the evaluations provided by the evaluators, a third evaluation is carried out. The evaluators must be confidential, impartial, honest and respectful.
The final approval of the article shall be made after the author has made changes, improvements and corrections and has responded to the observations of the evaluators.
Finally, the publisher sends, within a maximum of 15 days, through the OJS platform, the certificates of the evaluators, without mentioning their identification, or any other data that allows it.
PLAGIARISM AND ANTI-PLAGIARISM
The authors will explicitly collect data, images and information. If non-compliance is detected at the first stage of evaluation, the shipment will automatically be dismissed and will therefore not be transferred to the peer evaluation phase. If detected after publication, the corresponding retraction note shall be made.
The editorial team has the following anti-plagiarism tool:
- Plagium
- Viper
- Turnitin
Copyright Notice
Copyright Policy © and CC BY-NC-ND
Tantak retains the property rights (copyright) of the published works, and with the use license indicated under this heading facilitates and enables their reuse.
The works are published under the Creative Commons Confession-Non-Commercial-Derivative Works License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) and can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and displayed to the public if:
Reference to the authorship and original source of the publication (magazine, publisher and URL of the work)
Don't use it for commercial purposes.
Mention the existence and specificities of this use licence.
Privacy Statement
The name, email address or personal data on the website of the journal shall be used only for the purposes of this journal, in accordance with the principle of privacy.
This is the data protection policy of the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
Data Processing Officer
Personal data provided directly by you shall be treated in a confidential manner, and the UPV/EHU shall be held in accordance with the relevant processing activity.
Objective
The purpose of the data processing will depend on the treatment activity of the UPV/EHU in each case.
Legitimization
We process the data for the performance of the legal duties of the UPV/EHU, for the performance of a function in the public interest or in the name of the public authorities assigned to the controller, and, if the processing requires the consent of the data subject, it must be carried out by means of a clear positive act.
How long the data will be stored
We will retain personal data as long as they are necessary for the purposes for which they were collected, or as long as they are necessary to clarify possible responses that may arise from the purposes of the processing. They must also be kept within the time limits laid down in the regulations on archives and documentation.
Data reporting
In general, no data shall be transferred to third parties except by law.
Rights of interested parties
Anyone has the right to know how their personal data are processed at UPV/EHU.
If you are interested, you have the right to access, rectify, delete and transfer your data, restrict or oppose the processing and not be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing. In possession of these rights, you may exercise them at the University of the Basque Country/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea by writing to the Data Protection Delegate, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa-Bizkaia, or by e-mail (dpd@ehu.eus).
Additional information
All UPV/EHU data protection policy information is available at www.ehu.eus/protección. This site contains, among other things, the updated list of processing activities carried out by the UPV/EHU; the legal basis for processing; the recipients that each of the processing activities may have; your rights to your data and the application forms for the exercise of those rights.