Beautiful and disgusting politics Taming evil and the importance of controlling the uncontrollable

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Portada AusArt vol. 6, número 2 (2018)
PDF (English)
Publicado 28-01-2019
DOI https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.20182
Jaseff Raziel Yauri-Miranda
Departamento de Ciencia Política y de la Administración Universidad del País Vasco (UPV-EHU)

Resumen

Evil doing is part of everyday social life and is extremely difficult to be counter-balanced by 'good' practices, let alone to be eliminated. Even in the realm of abstract politics, there is no simple solution or way to understand their overlapping nature. In that sense, this study explores the relationship between both sides through aesthetics and constructs a dialogical analysis transposed to politics. This relationship shows that beautiful and disgusting politics are not simply two sides of the same coin. The former has a limited potential to counterbalance the latter and, paradoxically, without its counter-part it has a limited potential to promote social transformations.

Cómo citar

Yauri-Miranda, Jaseff Raziel. 2019. «Beautiful and Disgusting Politics: Taming Evil and the Importance of Controlling the Uncontrollable». AusArt 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.20182.
Abstract 273 | PDF (English) Downloads 323

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Barel, Efrat et al. 2010. "Surviving the Holocaust: A meta-analysis of the long-term sequelae of a genocide". Psychological Bulletin 136(5): 677

Bennett, Jill. 2003. "The aesthetics of sense-memory: Theorising trauma through the visual arts". In Regimes of memory, ed. by Katharine Hodgkin & Susannah Radstone, 40-52. London: Routledge

Best, Victoria & Kathryn Robson. 2005. "Memory and innovation in post-Holocaust France". French Studies 59(1):1-8

Carroll, David. (1987) 1990. Paraesthetics: Foucault, Lyotard, Derrida. New York: Collman

Garcia, Fernando Gomes, Breno Mendes & Andrea Vieira, eds. 2014. Teoría da história em debate: Modernidade, narrativa, interdisciplinaridade. Belo Horizonte: Paco

Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2004. Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford CA: Stanford University

Han, Byung-Chul. 2015. The transparency society. Stanford CA: Stanford University

Lang, Berel. 1991. Writing and the moral self. London: Routledge

Luckhurst, Roger. 2013. The trauma question. London: Routledge

Marques, Vasco Baptista. 2017. "The dissidence of one with oneself: Lying in Vladimir Jankélévitch". In: From Kierkegaard to Heidegger: 2nd Workshop of the project Experimentation and Dissidence, eds. José Miranda Justo, Fernando M.F. Silva & Paulo Alexandre Lima. Lisbon: University of Lisbon

Moran, Patricia. 2007. Virginia Woolf, Jean Rhys, and the aesthetics of trauma. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Rancière, Jacques. (1995) 2015. Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. Edited and translated by Steven Corcoran. London: Bloomsbury

Rosa Camacho, Isaac. 2004. El vano ayer. Madrid: Planeta

Trías Sagnier, Eugenio. (1982) 2011. Lo bello y lo siniestro. Barcelona: Debolsillo

Wilde, Oscar. (1905) 2010. De profundis. London: Modern Library
Número
Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2018): Disidencia y sistema, sistema y disidencia ¿Es todavía posible hoy una crítica al sistema desde las prácticas artísticas?
Sección
Artículos
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Resultado de imagen de CC BY-SA 3.0)

Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Usted es libre de:

  • Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.es