Transmatriarchal structures Feminist emancipation and empowerment through artistic practice

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 2017-12-20
Cuautli Exal Martínez Sánchez

Abstract

Participatory and collaborative works of art emerge as micropolitical and emancipatory practices that make new social functions visible in the artistic practice. They are collaborative and transfeminist explorations that focus again the concerns of art on political construction, collective creation, networking, social cohesion, etc. Putting in value what is intangible such as communication, group dynamics, collaborative processes, or politics. Generating new forms of community production, new creative languages, new ways of artistic work dissemination as well as new aesthetic goals, linked to social and political work. In this article we analyze participatory and collaborative artistic practices as hybrid and interdisciplinary social and relational structures that promote the flexibilization and feminization of public space, political sphere, cultural creation and identity production. Establishing new symbolic and methodological universes that transform the social function of art and the artist in a postautonomus and postmedia context.

How to Cite

Martínez Sánchez, Cuautli Exal. 2017. “Transmatriarchal Structures: Feminist Emancipation and Empowerment through Artistic Practice”. AusArt 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.18142.
Abstract 433 | PDF (Español (España)) Downloads 606

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

TRANSFEMINISM, MICRO POLITICS, COLLABORATIVE ART PRACTICES, ARTIVISM

References
Birulés Bertran, Josefina. 2016. «Una revolució sense model, feminisme i transformació». Conferencia CCCB 5 abril. Vídeo de Vimeo, 1:22:01. https://n9.cl/8ner6

Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso

Brea, José Luis. 2007. Cultura RAM: Mutaciones de la cultura en la era de la reproductibilidad electrónica. Barcelona: Gedisa. https://n9.cl/ivmm1v

Claramonte Arrufat, Jordi. 2011. Arte de contexto. Madrid: Nerea

Finkelpearl, Tom. 2013. What we made: Conversations on art and social cooperation. Durham: Ducke University. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395515

Fischer, Gerhard, Elisa Giaccardi, Yunwen Ye, Alistair G. Sutcliffe & Nikolav Mehandjiev. 2013. «Meta-design: A manifesto for end-user development». Communications of the Association for Computer Machinery-EDU. https://n9.cl/unekd

García Canclini, Néstor. 2010. La sociedad sin relato: Antropología y estética de la inminencia. Madrid: Katz. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvm7bcb0

Giaccardi, Elisa & Gerhard Fischer. 2009. «Creativity and evolution: A meta-design perspective». University of Colorado at Boulder Papers. https://n9.cl/kexfbk

Giaccardi, Elisa. 2003. «Principles of meta-design: Processes and levels of co-creation in the new design space». Tesis University of Plymouth

Gianetti, Claudia. 2004. «Aesthetics and communicative context». Medienkunstnetz [Media Art Net]. https://n9.cl/rwdzk

Kester, Grant. 2004. «Dialogical aesthetics: A critical framework for littoral art». Variant 9. https://n9.cl/s4p5r

Matarasso, François. 1997. Use or ornament? The social impact of participation in the arts. Stroud UK: Comedia

Merrill, M. David, Leston Drake, Mark J. Lacy, Jean Pratt & ID2 Research Group. 1996. «Reclaiming instructional design». Educational Technology 36(5): 5-7. https://n9.cl/z8iyca

Virno, Paolo. 2009. Gramática de la multitud: Para un análisis de las formas de vida contemporáneas. Traducción, Adriana Gómez, Juan Domingo Estop, Miguel Santucho. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.