On the interplay of segmentation cues in adult OV/VO bilinguals: prosody, frequency and context language

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Argitaratua 2025-01-29
Irene de la Cruz-Pavía
Gorka Elordieta
Itziar Laka

Laburpena

The present study investigated the role of phrasal prosody in speech segmentation in adult bilingual speakers of two languages with opposite basic word orders: Basque and Spanish (Object-Verb and Verb-Object, respectively). We created a structurally ambiguous artificial language (AL) that allowed two possible parses, mimicking the order characteristic of OV and VO languages, and enriched it with the prosodic cue associated to languages with an OV order: a pitch contrast, in which the element receiving prominence within phrases has higher pitch than the non-prominent elements. We tested highly proficient L1Basque-L2Spanish and L1Spanish-L2Basque speakers on their segmentation preferences of the AL, addressing both groups in their respective L1 during the study. Analysis of their segmentation preferences revealed that the presence of OV prosody modulated—but did not determine—their parsing of the ambiguous AL, as both groups of bilinguals exhibited a significantly greater preference for the segmentation associated to OV languages than two similar groups presented with a prosodically flat variant of the same AL in de la Cruz-Pavía et al. (2022). These results confirm that phrasal prosody is an available segmentation cue for adult bilinguals, but suggests it is not a salient segmentation cue in this population.

Nola aipatu

de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene, Gorka Elordieta, eta Itziar Laka. 2025. «On the Interplay of Segmentation Cues in Adult OV/VO Bilinguals: Prosody, Frequency and Context Language». Anuario Del Seminario De Filología Vasca "Julio De Urquijo" 57 ((1-2):247-60. https://doi.org/10.1387/asju.25921.
Abstract 0 | PDF (English) Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Bernard, Carline & Judit Gervain. 2012. Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation? Frontiers in Psychology 3. 451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00451.
Bion, Ricardo A. H., Silvia Benavides-Varela & Marina Nespor. 2011. Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants’ and adults’ segmentation of speech sequences. Language and Speech 54(1). 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910388018.
de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene, Gorka Elordieta, Nuria Sebastián-Gallés & Itziar Laka. 2015. On the role of frequency-based cues in the segmentation strategies of adult OV-VO bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18(2). 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.904839.
de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene, Gorka Elordieta, Julián Villegas, Judit Gervain & Itziar Laka. 2022. Segmental information drives adult bilingual phrase segmentation preference. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25(2). 676–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1713045.
de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene, Judit Gervain, Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson & Janet F. Werker. 2019. Finding phrases: On the role of co-verbal facial information in learning word order in infancy. PLOS ONE 14(11). e0224786. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224786.
de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene, Judit Gervain, Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson & Janet F. Werker. 2020. Coverbal speech gestures signal phrase boundaries: A production study of Japanese and English infant- and adult-directed speech. Language Acquisition 27(2). 160–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2019.1659276.
de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene, Janet F. Werker, Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson & Judit Gervain. 2020. Finding Phrases: The Interplay of Word Frequency, Phrasal Prosody and Co-speech Visual Information in Chunking Speech by Monolingual and Bilingual Adults. Language and Speech 63(2). 264–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919842353.
de la Mora, Daniela M., Marina Nespor & Juan M. Toro. 2013. Do humans and nonhuman animals share the grouping principles of the iambic–trochaic law? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75(1). 92–100. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0371-3.
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0028.
Dutoit, Thierry. 1997. An introduction to text-to-speech synthesis. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Forster, Kenneth I. & Jonathan C. Forster. 2003. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35(1). 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503.
Gervain, Judit, Marina Nespor, Reiko Mazuka, Ryota Horie & Jacques Mehler. 2008. Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology 57(1). 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.001.
Gervain, Judit, Nuria Sebastián-Gallés, Begoña Díaz, Itziar Laka, Reiko Mazuka, Naoto Yamane, Marina Nespor & Jacques Mehler. 2013. Word frequency cues word order in adults: Cross-linguistic evidence. Frontiers in Psychology 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00689.
Gervain, Judit & Janet F. Werker. 2013. Prosody cues word order in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Nature Communications 4(1). 1490. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2430.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hahn, Michael & Yang Xu. 2022. Crosslinguistic word order variation reflects evolutionary pressures of dependency and information locality. PNAS 119(24). e2122604119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122604119.
Mattys, Sven L., Laurence White & James F. Melhorn. 2005. Integration of Multiple Speech Segmentation Cues: A Hierarchical Framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134(4). 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.477.
Mazuka, Reiko. 1996. Can a grammatical parameter be set before the first word? Prosodic contributions to early setting of a grammatical parameter. In James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to Syntax, 313–330. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Morgan, James L., Rushen Shi & Paul Allopenna. 1996. Perceptual Bases of Rudimentary grammatical categories: Toward a broader conceptualization of bootstrapping. In James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to Syntax, 263–283. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nespor, Marina, Mohinish Shukla, Ruben van de Vijver, Cinzia Avesani, Hanna Schraudolf & Caterina Donati. 2008. Different Phrasal Prominence Realizations in VO and OV Languages. Lingue E Linguaggio 7(2). 1–28.
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (29/12/2023).
Shukla, Mohinish, Marina Nespor & Jacques Mehler. 2007. An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology 54(1). 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.002.
Atala
Artikuluak

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>