The STEAM approach Participatory design in a citizen science experience

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 2020-06-30
Francisco Javier Serón Torrecilla

Abstract

The creating of objects is an artistic and design activity that allows a work from diverse approaches and methodologies. Increasingly, we see proposals associated with an open knowledge society that incorporates multi-agent practices. This article presents and analyses a project, which under the STEAM approach, intersects the artistic and design dimension with the concept of citizen science, and in which, together with our students from the Degree in Product Design, numerous agents have intervened in the solution of the problem. In the introduction, the social and educational context for the intervention is placed. It continues with a theoretical review of the principles of an open and co-participated design in its overlapping with experiences of citizen science, pointing out some aspects in relation to the methodological approach. In the following section, the general objectives of the proposal in relation to the design of the artefact are pointed out, as well as its description. Finally, the results are detailed from a reflective framework and the coherence with the analyzed approach. Finally, some brief conclusions about the cognitive dimension that motivate this kind of proposals and their articulation around the methodology used are noted.

How to Cite

Serón Torrecilla, Francisco Javier. 2020. “The STEAM Approach: Participatory Design in a Citizen Science Experience”. AusArt 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.21474.
Abstract 739 | HTML (Redalyc) (Español) Downloads 0 XML (Redalyc) (Español) Downloads 0 PDF (Español) Downloads 544

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

CITIZEN DESIGN SCIENCE, STEAM, DESIGN, ART, DESIGN TRAINING

References
Azcaray Fernández, Joseba Koldobika. 2019. “Metodología para integrar el diseño en un proceso curricular STEAM a través del uso de las nuevas tecnologías creativas”. Tesis Univ. Politècnica de València. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/125704

Gershenfeld, Neil. 2012. “How to make almost anything: The digital fabrication revolution”. Foreign Affairs 91(6): 42-57

Lee, Yanki. 2007. “Design participation tactics: Involving people in the design of their built environment”. Tesis Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ. http://ira.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/10397/2255

Lenz, Bob. 2015. Transforming schools using project-based learning, performance assessment, and common core standards. With Justin Wells & Sally Kingston. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass

Maeda, John. 2013. “STEM + Art = STEAM”. The STEAM Journal 1(34): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.201301.34

Manzini, Ezio. 2015. Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Translated by Rachel Coad. Boston MA: MIT

Mueller, Johannes et al. 2017. “Citizen design science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design”. Cities 72: 181-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018

Senabre Carbonell, Enric, Núria Ferran Ferrer & Josep Perelló Mulet. 2018. “Diseño participativo de experimentos de ciencia ciudadana”. Comunicar 54: 29-38. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/comunicar/article/view/62675

University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES). 2019. “Cambridge Primary Art & Design (0067)”. Subject programme. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/programmes-and-qualifications/cambridge-primary/curriculum/art-and-design

Yakman, Georgette. 2008. “STEAM Education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education”. Tesis Virginia Polytechnic and State Univ.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)