Documenting the cultural experience Autoethnography as story telling for research-creation projects in performing arts

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 2022-06-28
Félix Gómez-Urda

Abstract

Understanding the cultural experience of the community that one studies is one of the foundational objectives of social research. The description of such an experience can take various narrative forms within ethnography. This is the case of autoethnography, narrative for qualitative inquiry, where the researcher, as an active participant, documents and analyzes their own personal experience in response and relation to the studied subject or community. This approach reflects the subjectivity and sensibility of the researcher in their response to their subject and provides a clear account of the politics of engagement. This article frames theoretically and proposes autoethnography as a writing technique to question the position of researcher in both research-creation projects of performing arts: Todas las santas' (2021) and 'Transmigrarts' (2022). Both were held in person, in the middle of the pandemic, in the Spanish cities ofMadrid and Granada, respectively. In this paper, the author explores the embodied and existential tensions that arose in both experiences from his ambivalent position as a researcher-playwright when it comes to creating, prompting and inciting the game, but also when observing and analyzing what happened there.

How to Cite

Gómez-Urda, Félix. 2022. “Documenting the Cultural Experience: Autoethnography As Story Telling for Research-Creation Projects in Performing Arts”. AusArt 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.23577.
Abstract 399 | PDF (Español) Downloads 1646 HTML (Redalyc) (Español) Downloads 0 XML (Redalyc) (Español) Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

AUTOETHNOGRAPHY; RESEARCH-CREATION; SELF

References
Bárcenas Barajas, Karina & Nohemí Preza Carreño. 2019. “Desafíos de la etnografía digital en el trabajo de campo onlife”. Virtualis 10(18). https://doi.org/10.2123/virtualis.v10i18.287

Denzin, Norman Kent. 2006. “The politics and ethics of performative pedagogy: Toward a pedagogy of hope”. En The Sage handbook of performance studies, edited by D. Soyini Madison, Judith Hamera. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976145.n18

Geertz, Clifford. (1973) 1999. La interpretación de las culturas. Traducción, Alberto L. Bixio. Barcelona: Gedisa

Gómez-Urda, Félix, 2021. Escribir: Notas de un viaje a la autoetnografía. Madrid: Las Hedonistas

Hayano, David M. (1979) 2004. “Autoethnography: Paradigms, problems and prospects”. En The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Alan Bryman & Tim Futing Liao, editors. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage

Heider, Karl G. 1975. “What do people do? Dani auto-ethnography”. Journal of Anthropological Research 31(1): 3-17. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/jar.31.1.3629504

Holman, Stacy, Tony E. Adams & Carolyn Ellis, eds. (1966) 2013. Handbook of autoethnography. Walnut Creek CA: Left Coast

Léroux, Louis Patrick, 2013. “El investigador-creador frente a sus respuestas resonantes”. Traductora, Andrea Pelegrí Kristic. Apuntes de Teatro 138: 69–83. http://ojs.uc.cl/index.php/RAT/article/view/32267

Marcus, George E. & Michael M.J. Fischer. (1986) 2000. La antropología como critica cultural: Un momento experimental en las ciencias humanas. Traducción, Eduardo Sinnott. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu

Naukkarinen, Ossi, 2012. “Variations on artification". “Artification”, special vol. of Contemporary Aesthetics 4. https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol0/iss4/2

Preciado, Paul B. 2008. Testo yonki. Pozuelo de Alarcón: Espasa Calpe

Rógozov, Leonid Ivánovich. 1964. “Self operation”. Soviet Antarctic Expedition Information Bulletin, 223-224. http://corpus.leeds.ac.uk/serge/rogozov-1964.pdf

Ruiz Olabuénaga, José Ignacio. 2009. Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Bilbao: Deusto.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1986. “Imperialism and sexual difference”. Oxford Litterary Review 1/2: 225–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43964608
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)