A critique of contemporary artificial intelligence art Who is 'Edmond de Belamy'?

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Argitaratua 2020-06-30
Mikel Arbiza Goenaga

Laburpena

«Edmond de Belamy» is a 2018 painting made by French collective Obvious, created using a type of artificial intelligence algorithms called Generative Adversarial Networks, which was sold at Christie's auction house in New York for $432,500. This historic event —the so—called auction of the 'first artwork made by an AI' raises 3 interesting questions about authorship, originality, and the arts as a space for scientific inquiry. While some think that the current deployment of machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence techniques that we are seeing in the art world today may be seen as the ultimate Gesamtkunstwerk` or total artwork, other points of view express that not only we need this type of cultural artifacts as a critique of industrialized use of artificial intelligence, but also a strict criteria has to be delimited in order to review contemporary art made with machine learning techniques.

Nola aipatu

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2020. «A Critique of Contemporary Artificial Intelligence Art: Who Is ’Edmond De Belamy’?». AusArt 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1387/ausart.21490.
Abstract 2822 | PDF (English) Downloads 1581 HTML (Redalyc) (English) Downloads 0 XML (Redalyc) (English) Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Agüera y Arcas, Blaise. 2017. «Art in the age of machine intelligence». Arts 6(4): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts6040018

Akten, Memo. 2018. «Machine learning art: An interview with Memo Akten». Renée Zachariou. Artnome.com, 16 dec. https://goo.su/B1mzC

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2018a. «Evolution by design». MikelArbiza.net, 31 jul. https://goo.su/YNSNU76

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2018b. «Le Witt's immortal paintings». MikelArbiza.net, 18 june. https://goo.su/EUNShH

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2018c. «Machine learning art as scientific research». MikelArbiza.net (blog), 12 nov. https://goo.su/CEwNtK

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2018d. «Robotic citizenship is coming!». MikelArbiza.net, 26 oct. https://shre.ink/ehe1

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2018e. «The machine will have the idea…». MikelArbiza.net, 18 jun. https://shre.ink/eheU

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2018f. «The true poet is creative». MikelArbiza.net, 19 feb. https://shre.ink/ehe9

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2018g. «What is blockchain». MikelArbiza.net, 4 april. https://shre.ink/ehel

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2018h. «Who is Edmond de Bellamy?». MikelArbiza.net, 12 nov. https://shre.ink/ehe2

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2019a. «Artificial Intelligence: a revolution in the art world». MikelArbiza.net, 7 may. https://shre.ink/ehek

Arbiza Goenaga, Mikel. 2019b. «Computational aesthetics: The beholder needs eyes?». MikelArbiza.net, 20 may. https://shre.ink/eheW

Benjamin, Walter. (1935) 2008. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Translated by J.A. Underwood. London: Penguin

Bhatia, Richa. 2018. «Neural networks do not work like human brains: Let's debunk the myth». Analytics India Magazine, 10 jan. https://shre.ink/eheI

Bilal, Afaan. 2018. «Artificial neural networks and deep learning». Becoming Human, 31 jan. https://shre.ink/ehe8

Billitz, Nicole. 2014. «Lovelace 2.0 tests creativity». Versus.com, 24 nov. https://shre.ink/eheD

Boden, Margaret. 2012. «Creativity & AI: Asking the right questions; Interview at Oxford University». By Adam Ford. YouTube video, 26:52, 16 jan. https://youtu.be/5dEXIOiAsaw

Broeckmann, Andreas. 2016. Machine art in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge MA: MIT. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035064.001.0001

Buckner, Cameron & James Garson. 2019. «Connectionism». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 18 may. https://shre.ink/eheg/

Çaparlar, Ceyda Özhan & Aslı Dönmez. 2016. «What is scientific research and how can it be done?». Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology & Reanimation 44(4): 212-218. https://doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2016.34711

Christie's. 2018. «Is artificial intelligence set to become art's next medium?». Christies.com, 12 dec. https://shre.ink/eheb

Cohn, Gabe. 2018. «Up for bid, ai art signed 'algorithm'». The New York Times, 22 oct. https://shre.ink/eheM

Danto, Arthur C. 1998. «The end of art: A philosophical defensa». History and Theory 37(4): 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.721998072

Elgammal, Ahmed, Bingchen Liu, Mohamed Elhoseiny& Marian Mazzone. 2017. «CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, generating 'art' by learning about styles and deviating from style norms». ArXiv.org, 21 jun. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068

Elgammal, Ahmed. 2017. «Generating 'art' by Learning about styles and deviating from style norms». Medium.com, 26 jun. https://shre.ink/ehee

Elgammal, Ahmed. 2018. «Meet AICAN, a machine that operates as an autonomous artista». The Conversation, 17 oct. https://shre.ink/ehex

Gayford, Martin. 2016. «Robot art raises questions about human creativity». MIT Technology Review, 15 feb. https://shre.ink/ehet

Giles, Martin. 2018. «The GANfather: The man who's given machines the gift of imagination». MIT Technology Review, 21 feb. https://shre.ink/eheS

Goodfellow, Ian J. et al. 2014. «Generative adversarial networks». ArXiv.org, 10 jun. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661

Hui, Jonathan. 2018. «GAN: What is generative adversarial networks GAN?». Medium.com, Jun. 19. https://shre.ink/eheo

Invaluable. 2019. «How artificial intelligence is changing the face of art». Invaluable.com, 29 jan. https://www.invaluable.com/blog/ai-art/

Jordan, Ken. 1998. «Defining multimedia». IEEE Multimedia 5: 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/93.664737

Knight, Will. 2017. «5 Big predictions for artificial intelligence in 2017». MIT Technology Review, 4 jan. https://shre.ink/eheq

Kogan, Gene. 2018. «The neural aesthetic @ ITP-NYU: Lecture 11, Autonomous artificial artists». YouTube video, 2:43:06, 4 dec. https://shre.ink/eheL

Krome, Sven. 2018. «Decentralized Autonomous Art: Art in the blockchain foreshadows our future». Here 360, 28 aug. https://shre.ink/ehe3

Lazic, Sanja. 2017. «Is authorship in art a victim of appropriation?». Widewalls Modern & Contemporary Art Resource, 24 july. https://shre.ink/eheG

Locke, Nancy. 2015. «How photography evolved from science to art». The Conversation, 11 mar. https://shre.ink/eheu

López de Mántaras Badía, Ramón. 2016. «Artificial Intelligence and the arts: Toward computational creativity». In The next step: Exponential life, Jay David Bolter et al.; publishing coordination, Nuria Martínez Deaño; translation, Wade Matthews. Madrid: BBVA

Monoskop. 2020. «Neural aesthetics: A resource on recent work between art / design and artificial neural networks in machine learning». Monoskop.org, 14 may. https://shre.ink/ehev

Morris, Andrea. 2018. «We need to talk about sentient robots». Forbes.com, 13 mar. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(18)30024-2

Moss, Richard. 2015. «Creative AI: The robots that would be painters». Newatlas.com, 16 feb. https://shre.ink/eheF

Offert, Fabian. 2019. «The past, present, and future of AI art». Skynet Today, 2 jun. https://lc.cx/hkp_8i

Packer, Randall. 2013. «The real history of multimedia». Inside/Out, 23 sept. https://lc.cx/KdfkMM

Pearson, Jordan. 2014. «Forget Turing, the Lovelace test has a better shot at spotting AI». Vice.com, 8 jul. https://lc.cx/50wcoZ

Reichardt, Jasia. 1987. «Machines and art». Leonardo 20(4): 367-372. https://doi.org/10.2307/1578534

Smith, Glenn W. & Frederic Fol Leymarie. 2017. «The machine as artist: An introductio». Arts 6(2): 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts6020005

Sukis, Jennifer. 2018. «The relationship between art and AI». Medium.com, 16 may. https://goo.su/7o24u

Vicent, James. 2018. «How three french students used borrowed code to put the first ai portrait in Christie's». Theverge.com, 23 oct. https://goo.su/UOAdMM6
Atala
Artikuluak

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.