Oztopo klimatikoa sare sozialetan: desinformazioa eta zientziaren ahotsen aurkako erasoak
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Argitaratua
12-06-2024
David Vicente Torrico
Marta Hernando Lera
Víctor González Puente
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-6086
Marta Hernando Lera
Víctor González Puente
Laburpena
Komunikazio tradizionalen sarrera-barreren aurrean, diskurso oztopo-motza sare sozialetan eta mezularitza-zerbitzuetan aurkitu du bere edukiak banatzeko sistema berri bat. Eduki-analisia bidez, ikertzen dugu zientzia erakundeak, erakundeak, ordezkaritza publikoak, ekintzaileak eta komunikazio-ereduak erasotzen dituzten komunikazioen ikuspegi kritikoa. Ikuspegi hauetatik, klima oztopoaren mapa estruktural bat egiten dugu sare sozialetan zehar. Emaitzak erakusten dute eztabaida berriak ez negatuaren lanari buruzkoak direla, baizik eta zalantza sortzen dutenak mezu bidaltzaileen inguruan, non ekintzaileak, erakundeak eta komunikazio-ereduak barne daudela.
Nola aipatu
Vicente Torrico, D., Hernando Lera, M., & González Puente, V. (2024). Oztopo klimatikoa sare sozialetan: desinformazioa eta zientziaren ahotsen aurkako erasoak. Zer - Komunikazio Ikasketen Aldizkaria, 29(56), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.25929
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
Berrikusketa, Sare sozialak, Oztopo-motza, Klima, Negazionismoa
References
A.P. (21 de abril de 2023). La AEMET pide "respeto" tras enfrentarse a una turba de conspiracionistas: "Nos estáis fumigando". El Periódico de España. https://www.epe.es/es/actualidad/20230421/aemet-conspiracion-clima-86310221
Abbar, S., Zanouda, T., Berti‐Equille, L. y Borge‐Holthoefer, J. (2016). Using Twitter to understand public interest in climate change: The case of Qatar. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.04010
Abellán López, M. Á. (2021). El cambio climático: negacionismo, escepticismo y desinformación. Tabula Rasa, 37, 283–301. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n37.13.
Anderson, A.A., Scheufele, D.A., Brossard, D. y Corley, E.A. (2012). The role of media and deference to scientific authority in cultivating trust in sources of information about emerging technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
Andrino, B., Pérez, J. y Rodríguez, R. (12 diciembre, 2019). Histérica, marioneta y majareta: los insultos que hombres dedican a Greta Thunberg en Twitter. El País. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2019/12/12/actualidad/1576106658_165755.html
Arce García, S., Díaz Campo, J., y Cambronero Saiz, B. (2023). Online hate speech and emotions on Twitter: a case study of Greta Thunberg at the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in 2019. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1), 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01052-5
Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G. y Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one, 10(2). https://doi.org/e0118093
Boykoff, M. T. (2009). El caso del cambio climático: los medios y la comunicación científica. Infoamérica: Iberoamerican Communication Review, 1, 117-127.
Capstick, S.B. & Pidgeon, N.F. (2014). What is climate change scepticism? examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change, 24, 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.012
Chen, K., Molder, A. L., Duan, Z., Boulianne, S., Eckart, C., Mallari, P. & Yang, D. (2022). How climate movement actors and news media frame climate change and strike: Evidence from analyzing twitter and news media discourse from 2018 to 2021. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Advance online publication, 28(2), 384-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221106405
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S. & Ecker, U.K. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PloS one, 12(5), e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S. & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(5), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353
Darius, P. y Stephany, F. (2019). “Hashjacking” the Debate: Polarisation Strategies of Germany’s Political Far-Right on Twitter. En Social Informatics: 11th International Conference, Doha, Qatar, November 18–21, 2019, Proceedings 11 (pp. 298-308). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_21
Di Placido, D. (29 de diciembre de 2022). Esta es la respuesta viral de Greta Thunberg al ataque de Andrew Tate en Twitter. Forbes. https://forbes.es/actualidad/213906/esta-es-la-respuesta-viral-de-greta-thunberg-al-ataque-de-andrew-tate-en-twitter/
Dias, N. and Sippitt, A. (2020), Researching Fact Checking: Present Limitations and Future Opportunities. Political Quarterly, 91(3), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12892
Diethelm, P. and McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientist respond? European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2–4, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ ckn139
Ekberg, K., Forchtner, B., Hultman, M. y Jylhä, K.M. (2022). Climate Obstruction: How Denial, Delay and Inaction Are Heating the Planet. Routledge.
Elgesem D., Steskal L. y Diakopoulos N. (2015). Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: The big picture. Environmental Communication, 9, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.983536
Frances Bloomfield, E. y Tillery, D. (2019). The Circulation of Climate Change Denial Online: Rhetorical and Networking Strategies on Facebook. Environmental Communication, 13(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1527378
Gandolfo, V. J. (2017). Falta de derechos humanos y violencia: La crisis ambiental en América Latina [Tesis de grado]. Universidad Trinity College
García Avilés, J.A., Navarro Maillo, F. y Arias Robles, F. (2014). La credibilidad de los contenidos informativos en internet para los nativos digitales: estudio de caso. Palabra clave, 17(3), 875-894. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2014.17.3.13
García Jiménez, A., Tur Viñes, V. y Pastor Ruiz, Y. (2018). Consumo mediático de adolescentes y jóvenes. Noticias, contenidos audiovisuales y medición de audiencias. Icono 14, 16(1), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1101
García Hernández, J., y López Gallegos, M. (2018). Mujeres mártires ambientales en América Latina. Una visibilización de los ecofeminicidios por la defensa del territorio en México. HistoriAgenda, 3(33), 21–33
Hameleers, M. (2020). My reality is more truthful than yours: Radical right-wing politicians’ and citizens’ construction of “fake” and “truthfulness” on social media—Evidence from the United States and the Netherlands. International Journal of Communication, 14, 18. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12463
Hameleers, M. y van der Meer, T. (2020). Misinformation and Polarization in a High-Choice Media Environment: How Effective Are Political Fact-Checkers? Communication Research, 47(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218819671
Harvey, J.A., Van den Berg, D., Ellers, J., Kampen, R., Crowther, T.W., Roessingh, P., Verheggen, B., Nuijten, R., Post, E., Lewandowsky, S., Stirling, I., Balgopal, M., Amstrup, S.C. y Mann, M.E. (2018). Internet Blogs, Polar Bears, and Climate-Change Denial by Proxy. BioScience, 68(4), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix133
Heras, F. (2013). La negación del cambio climático en España: percepciones sociales y nuevos tratamientos mediáticos. En R. Mancinas Chávez (coord.) y R. Fernández Reyes (dir.) Medios de comunicación y cambio climático (pp. 155-170). Facultad de Comunicación de la Universidad de Sevilla.
Heras, F. (2018). Respuestas ante el negacionismo climático de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global. Revista PAPELES, 140, 119-130.
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D, y Logan, D. (2012). Share, Like, Recommend. Decoding the Social Media News Consumer. Journalism Studies, 13 (5-6): 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
Herrero, E. & Herrero Damas, S. (2021). El fact-checker en español alrededor del mundo: Perfil, similitudes y diferencias entre verificadores hispanohablantes. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 54, 49–77, https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2021.54.e725
Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison Wesley
Howell, E.L., Wirz, C.D., Scheufele, D.A., Brossard, D. y Xenos, M.A. (2020). Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism’. Public Understanding of Science, 29(8), 800–818, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0963662520962741
IPCC (2022). AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycl
Jang, S. M., y Hart P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010
Kirilenko, A. P. y Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global Environmental Change, 26, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008
Lamb, W.F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J.T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J.C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., y Steinberger, J.K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3(17), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13
Lampis, A. (2013). La adaptación al cambio climático: el reto de las dobles agendas. En J.C. Postigo (ed.) Cambio climático, movimientos sociales y políticas públicas: una vinculación necesaria. Clacso.
León, B. y Bourk, M. (2018). Communicating Science and Technology through Online Video. Routledge
León, B. y Erviti, M.C. (2013). Science in pictures: Visual representation of climate change in Spain’s television news. Public Understanding of Science, 24(2), 183–199, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513500196
Martín Sánchez, A. (2020). Respuestas a la crisis climática: negacionismo populista y nacionalismo verde. Ecología Política, 59, 24-28. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ descarga/articulo/7528856.pdf
Martín Sosa, S. (2021). Apuntes metodológicos para el estudio del negacionismo climático en los medios escritos. Communication & Methods, 3(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.35951/v3i1.111
McKie, R., Holder, F., Sanober, M., Carbone, J. & Ngo-Lee N. (2022). Climate Obstruction and Facebook Advertising: How a Sample of Climate Obstruction Organizations Use social media to Disseminate Discourses of Delay. Climatic Change, 176, 16. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1760493/
Meyer, H., Peach, A.K., Guenther, L., Kedar, H.E. y Brüggemann, M. (2023). Between Calls for Action and Narratives of Denial: Climate Change Attention Structures on Twitter. Media and Communication 11, (1), 278–292. https://doi.org/ 10.17645/mac.v11i1.6111
Mohan, L. (25 de Agosto de 2021). Perspective: Tackling misinformation on YouTube. Inside YouTube. https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/tackling-misinfo/
Molina Cañabate, J.P. y Magallón Rosa, R. (2020). Desinformación y periodismo científico: el caso de Maldita Ciencia. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación: Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 11(2), 11-21.
https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.4 10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.4
Moreno Olmeda, T. (2022). Del negacionismo climático al obstruccionismo: el argumentario de la inacción y su amplificación en YouTube. Dilemata, 38, 119-134. https://www.dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/412000489
Nguyen, A. & Catalan, D. (2020). Digital mis/disinformation and public engagment with health and science controversies: Fresh perspectives from Covid-19. Media and Communication, 8(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352
Norgaard, K.M. (2006). “People want to protect themselves a little bit”: Emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry, 76(3): 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2006.00160.x
Painter, J., Erviti, M.C., Fletcher, R., Howarth, C., Kristiansen, S., León, B., Ouakrat, A., Russell, A. y Schäfer, M.S. (2016). Something old, something new: digital media and the coverage of climate change. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F.G. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quiantitative content analysis in research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Rodrigo Cano, D. y Del Río Álvarez, M. J. (2021). La desinformación sobre salud y cambio climático en redes sociales. En J.C. Figuereo-Benítez y R. Mancinas-Chávez (coords.) Las redes de la comunicación: estudios multidisciplinares actuales (pp. 833-846). Dykinson.
Schäfer, M.S. (2015). Climate change and the media. En J.D. Wright (ed) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 853-859). Elsevier
Shapiro, M.A. y Park, H.W. (2015). More than entertainment: YouTube and public responses to the science of global warming and climate change. Social Science Information, 54(1), 115-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018414554730
Siwakoti, S., Yadav, K., Bariletto, N., Zanotti, L., Erdogdu, U. & Shapiro, J.N. (2021). How COVID drove the evolution of fact-checking. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-69
Stencel, M., Ryan, E. & Luther, J. (21 de junio de 2023), Misinformation spreads, but fact-checking has leveled off. Duke Reporters’ Lab. https://reporterslab.org/ misinformation-spreads-but-fact-checking-has-leveled-off/
Tran, D. y Hanaček, K. (2023). A global analysis of violence against women defenders in environmental conflicts. Nature sustainability, 6, 1045-1053. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/s41893-023-01126-4
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. y Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: design and methods, applied social research methods series. Sage
Abbar, S., Zanouda, T., Berti‐Equille, L. y Borge‐Holthoefer, J. (2016). Using Twitter to understand public interest in climate change: The case of Qatar. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.04010
Abellán López, M. Á. (2021). El cambio climático: negacionismo, escepticismo y desinformación. Tabula Rasa, 37, 283–301. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n37.13.
Anderson, A.A., Scheufele, D.A., Brossard, D. y Corley, E.A. (2012). The role of media and deference to scientific authority in cultivating trust in sources of information about emerging technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
Andrino, B., Pérez, J. y Rodríguez, R. (12 diciembre, 2019). Histérica, marioneta y majareta: los insultos que hombres dedican a Greta Thunberg en Twitter. El País. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2019/12/12/actualidad/1576106658_165755.html
Arce García, S., Díaz Campo, J., y Cambronero Saiz, B. (2023). Online hate speech and emotions on Twitter: a case study of Greta Thunberg at the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in 2019. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1), 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01052-5
Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G. y Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one, 10(2). https://doi.org/e0118093
Boykoff, M. T. (2009). El caso del cambio climático: los medios y la comunicación científica. Infoamérica: Iberoamerican Communication Review, 1, 117-127.
Capstick, S.B. & Pidgeon, N.F. (2014). What is climate change scepticism? examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change, 24, 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.012
Chen, K., Molder, A. L., Duan, Z., Boulianne, S., Eckart, C., Mallari, P. & Yang, D. (2022). How climate movement actors and news media frame climate change and strike: Evidence from analyzing twitter and news media discourse from 2018 to 2021. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Advance online publication, 28(2), 384-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221106405
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S. & Ecker, U.K. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PloS one, 12(5), e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799
Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S. & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(5), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353
Darius, P. y Stephany, F. (2019). “Hashjacking” the Debate: Polarisation Strategies of Germany’s Political Far-Right on Twitter. En Social Informatics: 11th International Conference, Doha, Qatar, November 18–21, 2019, Proceedings 11 (pp. 298-308). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_21
Di Placido, D. (29 de diciembre de 2022). Esta es la respuesta viral de Greta Thunberg al ataque de Andrew Tate en Twitter. Forbes. https://forbes.es/actualidad/213906/esta-es-la-respuesta-viral-de-greta-thunberg-al-ataque-de-andrew-tate-en-twitter/
Dias, N. and Sippitt, A. (2020), Researching Fact Checking: Present Limitations and Future Opportunities. Political Quarterly, 91(3), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12892
Diethelm, P. and McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientist respond? European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2–4, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ ckn139
Ekberg, K., Forchtner, B., Hultman, M. y Jylhä, K.M. (2022). Climate Obstruction: How Denial, Delay and Inaction Are Heating the Planet. Routledge.
Elgesem D., Steskal L. y Diakopoulos N. (2015). Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: The big picture. Environmental Communication, 9, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.983536
Frances Bloomfield, E. y Tillery, D. (2019). The Circulation of Climate Change Denial Online: Rhetorical and Networking Strategies on Facebook. Environmental Communication, 13(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1527378
Gandolfo, V. J. (2017). Falta de derechos humanos y violencia: La crisis ambiental en América Latina [Tesis de grado]. Universidad Trinity College
García Avilés, J.A., Navarro Maillo, F. y Arias Robles, F. (2014). La credibilidad de los contenidos informativos en internet para los nativos digitales: estudio de caso. Palabra clave, 17(3), 875-894. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2014.17.3.13
García Jiménez, A., Tur Viñes, V. y Pastor Ruiz, Y. (2018). Consumo mediático de adolescentes y jóvenes. Noticias, contenidos audiovisuales y medición de audiencias. Icono 14, 16(1), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1101
García Hernández, J., y López Gallegos, M. (2018). Mujeres mártires ambientales en América Latina. Una visibilización de los ecofeminicidios por la defensa del territorio en México. HistoriAgenda, 3(33), 21–33
Hameleers, M. (2020). My reality is more truthful than yours: Radical right-wing politicians’ and citizens’ construction of “fake” and “truthfulness” on social media—Evidence from the United States and the Netherlands. International Journal of Communication, 14, 18. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12463
Hameleers, M. y van der Meer, T. (2020). Misinformation and Polarization in a High-Choice Media Environment: How Effective Are Political Fact-Checkers? Communication Research, 47(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218819671
Harvey, J.A., Van den Berg, D., Ellers, J., Kampen, R., Crowther, T.W., Roessingh, P., Verheggen, B., Nuijten, R., Post, E., Lewandowsky, S., Stirling, I., Balgopal, M., Amstrup, S.C. y Mann, M.E. (2018). Internet Blogs, Polar Bears, and Climate-Change Denial by Proxy. BioScience, 68(4), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix133
Heras, F. (2013). La negación del cambio climático en España: percepciones sociales y nuevos tratamientos mediáticos. En R. Mancinas Chávez (coord.) y R. Fernández Reyes (dir.) Medios de comunicación y cambio climático (pp. 155-170). Facultad de Comunicación de la Universidad de Sevilla.
Heras, F. (2018). Respuestas ante el negacionismo climático de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global. Revista PAPELES, 140, 119-130.
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D, y Logan, D. (2012). Share, Like, Recommend. Decoding the Social Media News Consumer. Journalism Studies, 13 (5-6): 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
Herrero, E. & Herrero Damas, S. (2021). El fact-checker en español alrededor del mundo: Perfil, similitudes y diferencias entre verificadores hispanohablantes. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 54, 49–77, https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2021.54.e725
Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison Wesley
Howell, E.L., Wirz, C.D., Scheufele, D.A., Brossard, D. y Xenos, M.A. (2020). Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism’. Public Understanding of Science, 29(8), 800–818, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0963662520962741
IPCC (2022). AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycl
Jang, S. M., y Hart P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32, 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010
Kirilenko, A. P. y Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global Environmental Change, 26, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008
Lamb, W.F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J.T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J.C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., y Steinberger, J.K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3(17), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13
Lampis, A. (2013). La adaptación al cambio climático: el reto de las dobles agendas. En J.C. Postigo (ed.) Cambio climático, movimientos sociales y políticas públicas: una vinculación necesaria. Clacso.
León, B. y Bourk, M. (2018). Communicating Science and Technology through Online Video. Routledge
León, B. y Erviti, M.C. (2013). Science in pictures: Visual representation of climate change in Spain’s television news. Public Understanding of Science, 24(2), 183–199, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513500196
Martín Sánchez, A. (2020). Respuestas a la crisis climática: negacionismo populista y nacionalismo verde. Ecología Política, 59, 24-28. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ descarga/articulo/7528856.pdf
Martín Sosa, S. (2021). Apuntes metodológicos para el estudio del negacionismo climático en los medios escritos. Communication & Methods, 3(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.35951/v3i1.111
McKie, R., Holder, F., Sanober, M., Carbone, J. & Ngo-Lee N. (2022). Climate Obstruction and Facebook Advertising: How a Sample of Climate Obstruction Organizations Use social media to Disseminate Discourses of Delay. Climatic Change, 176, 16. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1760493/
Meyer, H., Peach, A.K., Guenther, L., Kedar, H.E. y Brüggemann, M. (2023). Between Calls for Action and Narratives of Denial: Climate Change Attention Structures on Twitter. Media and Communication 11, (1), 278–292. https://doi.org/ 10.17645/mac.v11i1.6111
Mohan, L. (25 de Agosto de 2021). Perspective: Tackling misinformation on YouTube. Inside YouTube. https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/tackling-misinfo/
Molina Cañabate, J.P. y Magallón Rosa, R. (2020). Desinformación y periodismo científico: el caso de Maldita Ciencia. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación: Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 11(2), 11-21.
https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.4 10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.4
Moreno Olmeda, T. (2022). Del negacionismo climático al obstruccionismo: el argumentario de la inacción y su amplificación en YouTube. Dilemata, 38, 119-134. https://www.dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/412000489
Nguyen, A. & Catalan, D. (2020). Digital mis/disinformation and public engagment with health and science controversies: Fresh perspectives from Covid-19. Media and Communication, 8(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352
Norgaard, K.M. (2006). “People want to protect themselves a little bit”: Emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry, 76(3): 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2006.00160.x
Painter, J., Erviti, M.C., Fletcher, R., Howarth, C., Kristiansen, S., León, B., Ouakrat, A., Russell, A. y Schäfer, M.S. (2016). Something old, something new: digital media and the coverage of climate change. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F.G. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quiantitative content analysis in research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Rodrigo Cano, D. y Del Río Álvarez, M. J. (2021). La desinformación sobre salud y cambio climático en redes sociales. En J.C. Figuereo-Benítez y R. Mancinas-Chávez (coords.) Las redes de la comunicación: estudios multidisciplinares actuales (pp. 833-846). Dykinson.
Schäfer, M.S. (2015). Climate change and the media. En J.D. Wright (ed) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 853-859). Elsevier
Shapiro, M.A. y Park, H.W. (2015). More than entertainment: YouTube and public responses to the science of global warming and climate change. Social Science Information, 54(1), 115-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018414554730
Siwakoti, S., Yadav, K., Bariletto, N., Zanotti, L., Erdogdu, U. & Shapiro, J.N. (2021). How COVID drove the evolution of fact-checking. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-69
Stencel, M., Ryan, E. & Luther, J. (21 de junio de 2023), Misinformation spreads, but fact-checking has leveled off. Duke Reporters’ Lab. https://reporterslab.org/ misinformation-spreads-but-fact-checking-has-leveled-off/
Tran, D. y Hanaček, K. (2023). A global analysis of violence against women defenders in environmental conflicts. Nature sustainability, 6, 1045-1053. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/s41893-023-01126-4
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. y Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: design and methods, applied social research methods series. Sage
Atala
Dossier
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
(c) UPV/EHU Press